English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Yes. You should be making about 40 percent of your annual salary

2007-08-01 00:38:29 · answer #1 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0 1

A full pension, no. A decent pension, perhaps.

To qualify for full Railroad Retirement Benefits one must have 360 months of compensated service. Hiring out today, depending on your date of birth, the age to collect is 65 or 67.

The exception is, if you have 240 months of compensated service, and are forced to retire early due to disability, then full benefits are payable, the same as if you had participated for the full 360 months.

This doesn't mean you shouldn't take the job. I always maintain that any time you can get your name on a seniority roster it's best to go for it. There are many other benefits besides a good pension to consider, primary of which is health coverage.

RRT pays about 4 to 5 times better than social security. I was out early due to disability, and with 28 1/2 years paid in I'm collecting nearly $3000 per month. So, to any rails reading this, NO LAYING OFF! I want them checks to keep a'commin'....

2007-07-31 10:46:26 · answer #2 · answered by Samurai Hoghead 7 · 0 0

It wouldn't be enough for a full pension. You must have 30 years in to retire at 60. Otherwise you'd have to work to 65. And no, a pension from somewhere else or social security won't count towards the difference.

2007-08-02 23:39:14 · answer #3 · answered by penhead72 5 · 0 0

Honestly....the apple didn't fall far from the tree. You sound quit immature yourself (if your really 32yrs old). Why would a 32yr old man be asking a website with mostly kids on line about his ridiculous father? A big fearless Valentino????? Are you sure your not a kid? A grown man would not refer to his dad's dates like that. And in real life...you don't marry a career, you marry a person. So hence, marrying an artist is not a problem, marrying a womanizer is.

2016-04-01 04:06:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not as good as 30 yrs but to tell you the truth, it is probably a hell of a lot better than 22 yrs with any Social Security job.
go for it, you wont be sorry.

2007-07-31 11:25:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers