I'd say it's better not to believe things easily than to believe anything at the cost of logical, rational thought.
2007-07-31 09:38:52 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Unbeliever.
2007-07-31 09:41:18 · answer #1 · answered by Clerical error 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Agreed. I would much rather be called an unbeliever. The way some act, illogical thinking is "Godly", as if having any kind of intelligence is suddenly Satanic.
2007-07-31 17:12:42 · answer #2 · answered by River 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Aren't they one and the same?
I mean really you unbelievers all seem to believe in the impossibility of evolution and the big bang both of which are statistically way beyond impossible. That seems very illogical to me.
2007-07-31 16:49:57 · answer #3 · answered by Tzadiq 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ooh, being an unbeliever. Illogical thinker would probably cut into every other area of my life as well (For the worse)
2007-07-31 16:42:04 · answer #4 · answered by ryoma136 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
An illogical thinker in a backwards kind of way.
2007-07-31 16:46:44 · answer #5 · answered by Lukusmcain// 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unbeliever because I know I'm not an illogical thinker
2007-07-31 16:42:08 · answer #6 · answered by darwinsfriend AM 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Neither, I am a child of God. I am a believer and a logical thinker both.
2007-07-31 16:42:31 · answer #7 · answered by LaptopJesus 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
im called a logical thinker
2007-07-31 16:43:47 · answer #8 · answered by slopoke6968 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Unbeliever, easily.
I do believe in things... including God... but I can't prove God and admit that my belief is not based in fact but in a visceral perception of possible truth.
2007-07-31 16:43:19 · answer #9 · answered by ZombieTrix 2012 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Unthinker.
*Slurp*
Wooo!
2007-07-31 16:42:21 · answer #10 · answered by Spencer Y 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋