Because we're rich. And spoiled. We think we have an absolute right to use a 6000 lb SUV to take one person a mile on paved streets to the grocery store, regardless of the environmental damage we cause.
What people who claim this right are overlooking is that SUVs are cut a special break on gas mileage standards. If we fix that problem, and require them to get the same average mileage as cars, I'll have no problem with the "freedom of choice" argument. But SUV owners will claim they "need" special rules for them.
If everyone would just buy the smallest car that meets their real needs, and stop buying large trucks because it makes them feel good, we'd be a lot better off.
2007-07-31 07:54:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bob 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Oil shortage? What will you liberals think of next?
Where's the shortage? Can't scare enough people with the global warming fraud?
The only shortage there is lies with the refining capacity and where you will let us get our oil from. It's okay to feed our addiction while drilling in oil fields in an overseas sandbox, just don't try drilling in the US for it.
Don't allow us to expand our refining capacity because some other tree hugger will get all fired up about it.
Everyone should drive what they WANT to drive. As fast as you liberals what to legislate our freedoms away, we still have the ability to choose to drive what we WANT to drive.
I feel a LOT safer if someone on the interstate hit me while driving my truck than some tin can ultra-econo or hybrid car.
Some people NEED bigger cars, but we all have a RIGHT to CHOOSE!
2007-08-02 06:23:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by elmar66 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have a lot of trouble feeling sorry for people that complain about the high price of gas while filling up their SUV's or trucks that get less than 20 mpg. I drive a small car that averages near 30mpg but ride my motorcycle most of the time because it gets better mileage.
SUV's are seen by many people as status symbols due to their high cost and a truck makes a person look tough. Advertising has done a good job of implanting these images. There are very few ads that show the value of small cars with great gas mileage.
JMS: There are some people that need to drive larger vehicles but most families don't consist of 4 kids.
2007-07-31 06:42:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Truth is elusive 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
A. The "I'll do what I want because this is a free country" argument.
B. The "Bigger cars are safer. I'd rather be the windshield than the bug" argument. Which would disappear if people realized that by driving big cars for safety they are causing others to drive big cars for safety which is the problem they are afraid of in the first place.
C. The "the peak oil crisis is a liberal myth" argument.
2007-07-31 06:46:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by joecool123_us 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
investment in renewable technologies is going on right now. One will no longer be able to be self-adequate in the popular international. each and every guy or woman does not have adequate land to strengthen adequate veg and meat animals for a kin. maximum suitable case, a pair of million/2 the veg and none of meat till you prefer to devour rabbit each and every of the time. there is not any "oil disaster". production is positive, grant is positive. the present costs are being led to with the help of the day investors in the inventory markets international-huge, same because of the fact the intense food costs. to illustrate, there is actual a glut of sugar - greater being produced than the international is using - however the fee has risen better than 40% because of the fact the day investors positioned it to the information media that there could be a scarcity so as that costs could bypass up and their own investements in sugar futures could additionally bypass up. Now, they do no longer strengthen the sugar, and that they do no longer actual even purchase it - they purchase speculations on destiny sugar production, then sell formerly the crop is offered in. Oil is being carried out a similar way. there is not any scarcity of oil. yet once you study the mainstream media you may think of there is, and so do countless different people who're day procuring and merchandising in the inventory markets. And subsequently the fellow made inflation starts off, and maintains. What ought to be carried out is a few regulations relating to the touting of "information" memories that are no longer being researched with the help of the media formerly they scream them out in headines. while they become incorrect, the correction is on website 13 in small form on the backside, and the wear isn't basically already carried out yet maintains to be carried out. information media ought to be positioned returned into the genuine information section, the place they actually examine a tale formerly liberating it.
2016-11-10 19:59:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A lot of the answers here get right to the heart of it. Do you have the right to tell me how to live? You have bought a foreign car. You are contributing to the trade deficit. That is highly offensive to me. It is harmful to the rest of us. We should ban the import of foreign cars. You shouldn't be allowed to be so irresponsible. We need to raise awareness to what people like you are doing to harm this nation. We need legislation to correct this injustice.
Also, do you eat beef? Because that is not good either. And I'll bet there are several other things that you do that indirectly affects the rest of us. Maybe your local government should audit all of your activities and decide how you should live.
2007-07-31 15:35:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by areallthenamestaken 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
People drive big cars and/or SUV's for various reasons and they have every right to do so. You drive a 4 cylinder Accord for what ever your personal reasons are, and you also have every right to do so. But, you have no right to tell other people what they should drive any more than they do to tell you what to drive.
2007-07-31 13:16:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
People just think big cars are cool and to answer your question, It's not average people's job to conserve oil. When there's so little oil that alternative energy is actually cheaper than fossil fuels, we will definitely be using alternative fuels.
2007-07-31 07:22:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because the "oil shortage" is artificial.
The only reason for a 'shortage" is... Envirowhackos not allowing us to drill for oil in ou own country. There's almost as much oil in Alaska as there WAS in Saudi Arabia before they started pumpng it out.
Then there's the envirowackos not allowing us to build newer, more efficient, oil refineries in the US for the past 30 years. Its acutally amazing that the old refineries have been able to keep up with demand for fuels and lubricationg oils and other petroleum distillates... We keep demanding more .... but havn't increased production capacity since appx 1970....
And if you want to complain about gas prices... consider that appx HALF the cost of each gallon is federal TAX.
If you want to complain about oil company progfits... consider that if Starbucks had the same return on investment... they would close every shop as being failures. The reason the oil companies make so much money is.. they have HUGE volume... with VERY low profit margin.
Most businesses ar considered failures if their profit margin is under 30%... Big oil has appx 5% profit margin... They could make MORE money by just putting their money in to savings bonds... and telling you to go burn cow chips to heat your house in the winter...
2007-07-31 06:54:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
Why are you driving that big a** Accord around? Get a M'cycle (35 to 55mph) or a Moped (50 to 100mph) or better still a bicycle (no gas at all)?
2007-07-31 12:46:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by vladoviking 5
·
2⤊
1⤋