jesus's body with a dna sample showing his origins coming from mary and some unknown entity
2007-07-31 01:46:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I think there would be lots of ways that God could get the message to me if there was one and thats what they wanted. After all God is supposed to be an all powerful being. God could just reach in my mind and make me believe. To me God seems to be playing a bit coy if God exists. For those that want to believe the proof seems to be everywhere. The face of Jesus on a pizza is proof.
This is a bit risque but I was once told the fact that as a woman I can orgasm is proof of God. I was actually told this by someone quite sincere. I should require no further proof than that God gave me this gift even though I am a woman and it served no purpose. Actually it does have a biological purpose so I'm still not convinced.Or have you seen the video of Kirk Cameron with one of his buddies talking about how the banana is proof of God? Its hilarious!!
Apparently there is almost no standard of proof if you want to believe and everything you see if proof. On the flip side to the skeptical mind the proofs strain the limit of incredulity.
2007-07-31 02:07:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Zen Pirate 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
As an Atheist, i might constantly ask for evidence in this way of subject. i does not in undemanding terms settle for 'help' the two considering the fact that that would desire to be something. i might help any view I choose with the aid of bending the actuality in a undeniable thank you to healthful my needs. evidence in spite of the indisputable fact that, is nice. in case you could tutor something, you could tutor it to be genuine. you in undemanding terms can not argue with the info/evidence. except a theist replaced into in a position to modern-day some good info to tutor the existence of a god, why might desire to all and sundry settle for this? additionally, what are the significant subject concerns which would be distracted from while the controversy turns to evidence of existence? In a debate with regard to the existence of gods, somewhat there is not something greater significant to the controversy... the actuality that it somewhat is an tremendously difficult question to respond to isn't any excuse. Claims do certainly might desire to be supported in the event that they're to be taken heavily. Claims might desire to be proved in the event that they're to be believed. I recommend that the argument in favour of the existence of a god fails on the two counts.
2016-10-13 04:58:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by broderic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tricky, nowadays..
I've had subjective religious experiences, which went to prove the fallibility of such, in the end.
(I was utterly convinced, but utterly wrong.)
Prolonged and careful study of the bible convinced me it was not a divinely inspired and preserved set of documents.
The atheistic hypothesis seems to fit the nature of the world as I see it better than the theistic ones.
Perhaps a column of ants crawling onto my lap-top screen and arranging themselves to spell out "It's Christianity, Stupid" (or whichever faith is nearest the truth). That would give me pause for thought, especially as there's no-one to doctor my screen with an ant-attracting trail.
2007-07-31 02:05:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pedestal 42 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would expect a supernatural all-powerful all-knowing creator would have no issue convincing his creation is real. Yet it's all faith, and no proof, and worse, there are thousands of gods on record with similar claims of being the sole creator of the universe.
2007-07-31 01:53:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
"god" is an impossibility.Just as soon as "proof" comes.He becomes "inside of space and time" as opposed to the standard christian answer that god is "outside of space and time".Once something shows up,it is merely another object that can be measured.An advanced being?possible.A god?Impossible.God CANNOT exist in the universe.To do so negates all arguments of outside of space and time that are absolutely vital in explaining "Where did god come from" God can only exist as a concept,not a reality
2007-07-31 01:51:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by nobodinoze 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Proof for me is for him to come down from heaven and show himself to the world. Not to an individual not to a small group of people but to an entire population.
2007-07-31 01:46:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
It doesn't matter, just come up with something, anything, the tinyest scrap of evidence. Anything except that somebody said it, or wrote it a couple thousand years ago.
2007-07-31 01:49:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
For him to revel himself in all of his glory to the entire world not just small groups of people and then prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that he is the Christian god.
2007-07-31 01:51:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by John C 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
One can find The God's existence only by experience with his spiritual practices. I have many experiences and they are not at all coincidences. One should try on his own to find Him. All that he needs a Sadguru to find the way to see or reach God.
2007-07-31 01:52:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Vasu 2
·
0⤊
2⤋