Two cities by strategic weapons. All other attacks are smaller scale tactical bombings.
But there is a question of whether attacks during war-time (WW2, an actual war not a marketing phrase) should be treated the same as attacks outside of war (including now, since no war was declared).
But the US is a terrorist nation, not because of the military methods it uses, but because it relies on fear and chaos as a means of achieving its political goals.
2007-07-31 02:08:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Giant- The Revolutionary War can not be compared-to today lol. Of course they were behind rocks that is because neither side had more than guns or cannon. Also, the freedom fighters are not from Iraq they are fanatical followers of Islam that are filled with hate for anyone ---ANYONE that is not Muslim. That is the difference.
The Fanatical Terrorist of Islam want to obtain the world for Islam by the sword-their view is if we decide to now follow than kill us. Right now Iraq is a wonderful way to rally their cause. They are also worried because we have now introduced the idea to the Middle East people that they too could vote, have women in school in all countries, and have a choice and the future of their people.
2007-07-31 08:52:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ms Blue 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
regarding the WWII era -strategic bombing of civilian populations was standard tactics of all sides of the conflict. with the little difference that Allies were at least trying to hit something worthy for industry in the towns.
russians sell sukhois Su 30, SAM system Tor and who knows what else to the Iran. China sells whatever and whoever orders and pays. but these are no terrorists in your eyes, are they?
I cannot remeber the last time ANY terrorist attack hit something militarily worthy or important. all the time the victims are civilians in planes, buildings, marketplaces. that is terrorism, not the politics US is doing in Iraq. Terrorists do not found hospitals, they do not deliver care packages, they even do NOT care of special diets. ..oh no.. you are a muslim /eeerr ain't that offending?/ .. sorry, please return me that pork tin can and take rather this lamb ratio instead..
2007-07-31 08:45:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Looks like you are an agent of Taliban or AlQaeda. USA is selling arms to both sides in Mideast. But, why are these fools wasting their money in buying the arms and keep fighting with neighbours instead of using their funds for good health and education of their citizens? Where are the epicentres of terrorism - USA or Middle East? How many innocent people all over the world are killed by the so called jihadis? Show us just one incidence of killing of the innocents by USA in the name of religion. Look at the mirror before accusing USA of terrorism. You should attack the religious leaders proclaiming fatwas every other day rather than shouting at USA.
2007-07-31 08:49:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brave 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hey I have a suggestion for you. Since you are so Anti American and it's apparent you do not agree with what this Country stands for. Why don't you leave? Get out, go live in a cave in Iraq.
If you are So unhappy and you think you'd be happier in another Country get the hell out, we don't need morons like you! And by calling our Government Terrorist, you are basically calling our Troops terrorists and that makes you a Stupid uneducated jacka$$!!
GOD BLESS AMERICA
2007-07-31 10:10:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ginny 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the USA is a terrorists nation as you say. Then tell me why, when ever there is a problem in the world. The world expects the USA to fix it? This is from a US citizen
2007-07-31 08:51:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dave P 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's pretty simple:
When people attack our interests, we attack back. When they want to deal with things peacefully, we deal peacefully.
Just because you aren't paying attention doesn't mean it's "terrorism". They attack first, we follow up.
Even in Vietnam, people forget the investments we had in the country (along with the French and English) and surrounding countries that the Communists were trying to "liberate" (steal).
But we're "terrorists" for protecting our interests.
I don't begrudge Islam for fighting for what it believes. You and others make it pretty clear what they want.
We just happen to side with the United States' interests.
You've chosen sides. So have we. We can accept that.
2007-08-01 05:35:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
When was the last time a B-52 dropped bombs on a Pizza parlor, or a schoolbus, or a dance club?
Civilians get killed in every military conflict---its unfortunate and inevitable-- especially when the "military" targets are hiding in churches, mosques, and neighborhoods.
The difference is that the US military does not make a POLICY of targeting civilians like children, people lining up to get jobs, of people enjoying an evening at at nightclub.
Its kind of a shame to see people that can't grasp this vital difference
(And the colonists vs Redcoats comment is hilarious--thats not terrorism, its called "superior tactics" the colonists weren't shooting at British children or women...)
2007-07-31 08:51:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by chocolahoma 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
is your name bliss? because ignorance = bliss, the USA has protected many countrys from people such as u, yes u, even thugs so dumb can become a leader thru religion and politics, i believe very soon we (USA) will be sending over more bombs to the mountians of afghanies and send 2-3 mini nukes to your beloved iranian nuke sites,,,, bye and be sure to wear dark glasses when we strike
2007-07-31 10:20:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by alangj91761 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Now that's some good trolling...
But you somehow raise a good point about how some words have been so mis/overused they have no meaning anymore: terrorist, patriotism, rebel, etc.
But yeah, you're silly.
2007-07-31 10:27:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by scoot7 2
·
0⤊
0⤋