Absolutely, but then again, you have the liberal whiners crying about "rights" and coddling terrorists....
2007-07-31 01:22:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
whcwarrior is wrong
Nato should go in. The problem is BUSH has spurned the entire Nato and UN oranizations, acting like he doesn't need them or give a damn about their opinions.
Bush is a one man government.
We will not get the help from other countries because of his over zealousness and abandonment of rule of law.
When he is out of office, the next democratic president will engage the world in talks of diplomacy and get the Taliban ousted and capture Bin Laden.
2007-07-31 08:30:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
I will not kill unarmed women and Children or even men...simple that’s it I wont do it I’m not trained to do it and its not legal for me to do it.
So no that would not solve any problems.
Btw killing 2 million in Vietnam wasn’t genocide it was winning.
2007-07-31 08:41:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Commodevil 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
it is time to finish the Taleban, not to commit genocide.
amcrusher> it seems that killing 2 mio enemy soldiers is a genocide for you unless those 2 mio were Americans, then it would be a great victory for you, woudn't it?
2007-07-31 08:53:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
You would have to find them and figure out who they are. They all look alike. No uniforms, so you could not pick out friend from foe.
2007-07-31 08:30:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Atrocities......the USA killed over 2 million in Vietnam..oh , sorry we are the good guys.
Our strategic bombings have killed millions and leveled major cities...but that is oK
We are the "good guys" LMAO
The USA is TOTAL EVIL
2007-07-31 08:26:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋
It's long overdue.
2007-07-31 08:23:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋