English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

this is a post for people who have solid proof against christianity. i will point ou the obvious flaws in any logic i find in my next questionbut will accept any hard evidence.
i would write down some of my own evidence but im too lazy. oh and if u want to put evidence against evolution see my other question

2007-07-30 16:01:27 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

21 answers

Don't bother. If you are too lazy to post your own evidence, then I can't be bothered with your question. You are the one with a belief, so you prove it. I don't have to because I don't believe.

atheist

2007-07-30 16:04:13 · answer #1 · answered by AuroraDawn 7 · 7 2

Evolution does not necessarily have anything against Christianity.

Christians need not invent any outside enemies. Their own holy books are their own worst enemy. Like in Matthew, some guy on 'shrooms wrote that just after Jesus died, hundreds of dead bodies rose from the graves and started shambling around downtown Jerusalem "prophesying" to people? And this did NOT turn Jerusalem into an accursed ghost-town, celebrated as the City of the Damned 28 Days Later by every Roman or Arab or other literate stranger?? Is the Bible even REMOTELY credible with tall tales like this that are not corroborated anywhere else???

2007-07-30 16:13:59 · answer #2 · answered by PIERRE S 4 · 1 0

What I believe has little to do with reality, and has everything to do with where and how I was raised.

What I KNOW is that none of this stuff happened by accident, spontaneous generation, or unguided evolution. That would violate all the laws of science. A single cell has to do three things---respire, show irritability (negative reaction to certain stimuli) and reproduce.

In the primordial soup, a single cell could not have come into existance that could breathe and eat, demonstrate irritability, and most of all, reproduce. One does not have to believe in my Christian God to believe that the forces of life do not occur randomly. It just takes a basic high-school course in biology, and a bit of independant thought. A single cell, with a nucleus, mitochondria, ribosomes, endoplasmic reticulum, etc does not just come together. And then evolve into a mouse and an elephant. No freaking way.

Anyone who opposes teaching religion in schools has my attention. Anyone who opposes teaching intelligent design is an idiot

2007-07-30 16:17:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Proof only exists in formal mathematics. In real life, all we have is preponderance of evidence.

Botht he old testament and the new testament assert that many different kinds of miracles or supernatural phenomena happened in the past. We don't see any much miracles or supernatural phenomena now. There are two possible explanations for this. The "God exists but withdrew" hypothesis, or the "God and the miracles of the bible are myths" hypothesis. I believe the 2nd hypothesis is not only simpler, the preponderance of evidence favors it.

2007-07-30 16:09:46 · answer #4 · answered by Jim L 5 · 0 0

Evolution theory is a religious belief that fundamentally requires adherence to the religion of atheism and/or the religion of pantheism. “Evolution” is a hypothetical, unobserved process (without any known scientific mechanism) by which all things in the universe are said to have created themselves from nothing without needing the existence of a Creator. Evolution is a hypothetical process of onwards-and-upwards self-improvement where all things somehow create themselves and somehow increase their complexity of their own accord.

2007-07-31 15:24:26 · answer #5 · answered by Steve 4 · 0 0

Oi Matey,your blown out of the water before you've even put anything on paper?Go to this website and download it,then
go to Google and type in 'the birth of religion"
1/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity
when you have looked at all the evidence,come back on here and re-write your question,then just maybe we will give you the answer you need to help you win your arguement.
But if you fail,we the collective will laugh at every question
you post from now on ok.

2007-07-30 16:29:40 · answer #6 · answered by the-Devil-is-King 2 · 0 0

Biblical literalists don't buy into the concept of evolution. But evolution is now a proven fact, and even the Pope accepts it. From which one may conclude that Christianity and evolution are not necessarily antithetical.

2007-07-30 16:18:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow, what an amazing god complex you have to think you can stand in a position to judge logic and flaws, especially since you are an obvious believer in certain fairy tales but, hypocritically, not others. Using anything from the fable book is not evidence nor proof, nor is using any single historical reference which is also mentioned in that fable book, as even historical romance novels use ACTUAL historical references.

2007-07-30 16:06:40 · answer #8 · answered by Edhelosa 5 · 1 2

i think of you will locate that maximum persons of persons who call themselves Christians are additionally believers in evolution. this might put off despite in case you further the yankee wing of anti-technology to the numbers. working example, the biggest Christian denominations, e.g., Catholics, Anglicans, have not any subject with evolution. despite in case you do locate an occasional dissenter from this attractiveness of evolution in those agencies, their considerable theologians and church leaders have not any subject with it. the reason in the back of it is vitally common. because it stands ideal now, the only concept that bills for the reported phenomena is evolution. each and each "objection" it is been raised via biblical literalists has been laid to waste. (yet submit to in recommendations that maximum dogmatists won't be able to settle for any data that opposes their ideals.) in case you have been to verify on any authorized center of organic and organic learn, or college, you will locate little or no (often none) opposition to the belief-approximately evolution. ultimately, human beings shouldn't newborn themselves: If scientists locate data that factors faraway from ANY concept, they save on with the leads and, if necessary, alter or discard the previous concept. it is the version between scientists and dogmatists.

2016-10-01 01:53:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Christianity is only one of the three versions of the "one god theory". Unless the Christians admits that their god is same as Allah, the "one god theory" does not stand.

There is really nothing to argue about evolution versus creationism. Just let the Chinese and Indian take over the development of science and technology, and wait for your turn to go to Heaven.

2007-08-01 05:33:28 · answer #10 · answered by OKIM IM 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers