Because if she is my sister-in-law's cousin(by blood) then she should be my cousin by marriage.
If she is my sister-in-law's cousin then she is my cousin too by marriage. Right?
Because I am her cousin's brother (in law) so my sister (in law)'s cousin is my cousin too but by marriage. Right?
2007-07-30 11:02:59 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Family
If your sister-in-law is your wife's sister,you are considered a cousin to her cousin by marriage.
If your sister-in-law is your brother's wife, then you are not related to the cousin at all,but your brother is considered her cousin by marriage.
2007-07-30 11:07:31 · answer #1 · answered by Vermillion 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Technically speaking, she's your brother's
cousin (in-law), because he was the one to marry into that family and not you.
Your relationship normally doesn't extend
beyond the IMMEDIATE family (the bride's
parents and her siblings) members.
However; it would still seem awkward with you trying to get freaky with the cousin of your brother's wife. Just think of the confusions you guys would cause if you
were ever to marry and have kids...your brother's second cousin would also be his
niece or nephew. And so on, and so forth.
What a perversion that would turn out to be!
2007-07-30 11:22:40 · answer #2 · answered by sylvester m 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i could hate to could song this one. i could say that, interior the strictest experience, there probable is a few formal designation of relation, finally, yet your wager is as stable as mine as to what which would be referred to as. In all practicality, probable no longer, yet once you're fortunate adequate to get alongside ok including your in-regulations, then greater skill to you. that's as much as you all no be counted if or no longer you all evaluate one yet another kin. i be attentive to of a kin the place 2 brothers married 2 sisters, so all the resultant progeny have been, for loss of a greater suited term, double-cousins.
2016-10-19 08:02:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
An in-law relationship forms when an outsider marries into a family. The outsider is an in-law to the family members, except to the one he/she married. The outsider also refers to the family members as in-laws (again, except to the one he/she married). There is no blood relationship between the two people. The only in-law relationships are mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law and daughter-in-law. Although I affectionately refer to my husband's first cousin as my cousin-in-law, the correct designation is "first cousin of the husband."
There is such thing as a cousin-in-law, but this refers to the spouse of your (blood) cousin.
2007-07-30 11:05:25 · answer #4 · answered by Freethinker 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
yea all those possiblities make her your cousin although i know that in some states like New York and Wyoming that would not be considered a legal relation. It all came from legal arguments in Land desputes in the late 1970s.
2007-07-30 11:06:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are only related, to the sister in law by marriage. You don't take the whole family unless you are the one marrying.
2007-07-30 11:06:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
A cousin of some sort, I don't really know the whole breakdown
2007-07-30 11:08:30 · answer #7 · answered by Greg 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That seems to be right, although cousin-in-law doesn't sound right. I've never used that before.
2007-07-30 11:06:45 · answer #8 · answered by pala_jacob 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, you are cousins by marriage. Think of it this way... your brother's wife's cousin is your brother's cousin by marriage and your brother's cousins are your cousins.
2007-07-30 11:12:34 · answer #9 · answered by Therese W 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No she is not your cousin by marriage, now your spouse's cousin would be your cousin by marriage. Your sis-in-law's cousin is just well your sis-in law's cousin
2007-07-30 11:07:07 · answer #10 · answered by bazookakid381 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋