Why do Pauline Epistle conclusions, including Hebrews and Revelation, have no mention of L-w at all?

Question

The GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ WITH YOU ALL. AMEN.

Title of Hebrews: "The Epistle of Paul The Apostle To The Hebrews" reveals author. Who else qualifies as an Hebrew of Hebrews? Who else writes more NT than all six other NT writers combined? Not to mention Hebrews is canonized together with the other Pauline Epistles. Not to mention the conclusion contains Paul's token, notably in every epistle, and written by his own hand.

Revelation: Paul (his angel) sign-ified with his token in every epistle, written by his own hand.

Answer 1

Paul did not write Revelation. He probably did not write Hebrews (the identity of the writer is unknown).

When you read Romans, you find where Paul stands on the Law.

It was filled with the death of Jesus and he is our intermediary to fill the gaps of the law.

Answer 2

I agree with this other answer about Paul Rome and the Law. Keep in mind Saul of Tarsus was a power person in the Sanhedrin and a devout Pharisee. He knew the Law word for word. He was like a Torah cop. He had the power to have men stoned. Especially Christians like Stephen.
So it's kind of fitting that Jesus would choose him to establish the majority of new churches, write the most epistles and of course the hand book for Christianity Romans.
Nothing to do with Hebrews or even close to Revelations.
God Bless!

Answer 3

Paul was not any part of the real work.

Rip anything by Paul out of your bible.

Revelation was written by John the Beloved.