English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

24 answers

There are many listed here....http://www.icr.org/

I will give one

The rate of the decay of the magnetic field or the earth can be measured and at the current rate, measuring backward, the intensity of the field would not allow the earth to have supported life a mere 1 million years ago.

This comes from calculations of scientistsn who are NOT Christian.

interesting , huh?

2007-07-29 21:47:37 · answer #1 · answered by kenny p 7 · 1 1

If a thing exists it can be perceived, consequently, a thing must have a necessary and sufficient description - with no syntactic-systematic ambiguities and no meaningless sentences.

The grammatical structure must reflect its logical structure, such, that its logical properties can be interpreted from its syntactic structure. In effect, existence must be syntactically reflective of its own global consistency, yet also be allowed the freedom to evolve its own grammatical transformations within its own manifold boundaries of perception.


The multiplicity of separate conscious entities are necessarily
aspects of a uniform substrate, otherwise there would
be distinctly separate entities with no medium of
interaction.

Thus the conclusion is that there exists only ONE true
consciousness and all of the ostensibly separate
conscious entities are actually permutations and combinations of the multiplicity of all possible realities.

The ONE consciousness is exploring all possible
aspects of its own existence as it gains knowledge and
experience. The multiverse of possibility implies that you and I are just individual identities and there are potentially an
infinite number of "us" in all possible existant worlds.

All objects of perception require a uniform logically consistent substrate OF perception, meaning that all objects of perception require a uniform[consciously aware] mental template of subjectification. Thus if the objective world stability is perceived as it truly is then the stability of the subjective is the same as the stability of the objective. Ergo, the objective and subjective reality forms a duality, reflecting the two sides of the same coin called awareness or consciousness. Raw awareness and consciousness forms the most basic aspect of reality. Pure existence becomes pure thought/consciousness.

2007-07-29 21:56:02 · answer #2 · answered by cosmicyoda 2 · 1 0

there are a number of varieties of clinical info helping God's existence and inventive capability, alongside with the effective-tuning of the mathematical constants governing the universe, the shortcoming of naturalism to describe the wildly inconceivable progression of existence from inanimate rely, and the privileged planet status of the earth as probably the only inhabitable planet. The info it particularly is maximum compelling is Einstein's concept of usually used relativity (shown with the aid of eclipse observations of gravitation bending easy). Einstein's concept predicts an absolute commencing up to area and time (an implication Einstein himself discovered troubling). next info of a purple-shift of galaxies and history radiation shows that the universe started out in a huge Bang, a cosmic explosion from a single element (a singularity) on the commencing up of time. Now if time had a commencing up, then no naturalistic reason might desire to function outdoors of time to reason the Bang Bang. the only life like determination is to renowned that a undying, immaterial, all-powerful smart dressmaker might desire to account for creation out of not something, and the subsequent progression of a universe and a planetary abode for smart existence. Cheers, Bruce

2016-10-13 02:19:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I wish there was some.. other than what I feel in my heart scientifically I cannot prove him to you.. but you already know that.. so I figure I might as well tell you the truth.. for what you ask there is no answer.. it is faith and for some people that isn't enough.. for other it is. I just happen to be one of those others..

2007-07-29 21:44:34 · answer #4 · answered by Nicole B 4 · 0 0

For man, there are two dimensions to his existence: One of matter and the other of spirit. Reduced merely to the level of material existence, Man becomes a machine or a mere animal at best. But think of a machine that rebels against being a machine; or of an animal that refuses to be an animal. That is what man is! What is it that makes him rebellious, angry, disappointed, frightened or hopeful? What is his dimension that gives him his imagination, his artistic genius, his creative urge? Why does he have nightmares and sweet dreams?.

It is not matter that does it; evidently it is his spirit that makes him so different from animals. So to base our knowledge of the world and our philosophy of life simply on the material side of our existence to the complete exclusion of the spiritual dimension, is undoubtedly faulty. The strength of Islam as a philosophy and as a way of life is that it does not separate man's material life from spiritual life, and that it seeks a balance between the two dimensions of human existence.

2007-07-29 21:47:25 · answer #5 · answered by Aby 3 · 0 1

Just as soon as you give me your best scientific evidence that the 'big bang' happened without the guidance of any type of Controlling Agent. In the realm of science we understand there are causes and effects.

2007-07-30 01:49:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Scientific evidence is that evidence which is gained through the study, research, testing, and understanding of laws and theories; from an objective point-of-view or approach. Religious evidence is that which comes about from subjective points-of-view. It is measured, tested, researched, hypothesized, calculated, and understood; by scriptures, loyalty, belief, faith, and understanding of G-d.

While the scientific approach uses mathematics and other objective purposed sciences to find answers related to questions about things in, on, and around this planet. The approach of and purpose of religion is to invoke emotions, feelings, and those thought processes that deal specifically with subjective purposes. The two can’t be compared or studied through, with, or by the same methods, laws, rules, measurements, or calculations.

While I am grateful for all that science has accomplished towards understanding our universe. There are some things it can’t know, because those answers are not available within scientific methods. We can hypothesis all we want about the origins of life, the big bang theory, the theory of evolution, and other things; but that is all it will be (a hypothesis). We know and understand science is used in order to answer many of our questions concerning things and events in our lives. Just like a journalist wants to know (who, what, when, where, why, and how).

However, science, unlike the journalist is unable to answer (who, when, why). This is where religious beliefs come into play. Faith in G-d, can answer these questions; while (as stated already) science answers the others. Yes, science and religious beliefs can coexist in a person’s life. They do not have to be seen as ‘enemies’ of each other or cause us to view anyone as being ignorant or uneducated. Let me pose the following to you:

Is it logical to think that the big bang occurred due to ‘pure happenstance’? Or to say that the universe came about due to its balance within scientifically controlled laws, rules, purposes, methods, regulations, calculations, and known effects?

If you only understand or believe in the first, than how do you account for the accuracy with which we are able to measure, study, research, and test particles in our universe (as well as those billions of light years away). If however, in your mind only the second is true; than you have just done an injustice to yourself and science. By stating that there is no controlling agent within what we already know is true about the big bang. I do not see our beginning, as an event outside of the understanding of both science and religious belief. They can complement each other, if we chose to let them.

2007-07-30 00:34:20 · answer #7 · answered by yahweh_is_the_lord 3 · 2 0

The scientific method only applies to things that have physical prescence. It is utterly useless for invisible things like the human spirit. Why would any rational person sacrifice their life for others? Yet it happens. Why do people love each other? Yet it happens. Why do people grieve or feel remorse? Yet it happens. How do people know things without any logical explanation for how they know them? Yet it happens. Why do scientists believe that how the universe operates changes when we try to observe it? Who is doing the changing? Not God, for He has nothing to hide.

2007-07-29 21:52:25 · answer #8 · answered by single eye 5 · 0 0

Infinity must exist or the universe would have degraded into a uniform energy field well, infinity ago. Infinity therefore must contain infinite amounts of order because the law of entropy destroys order over time. This order in infinity is the best evidence for God.

2007-07-29 21:42:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

...the fact that you woke up this morning and weren't plug'd into an electrical appliance should be evidence enough... however, can you take a "dead" seed... plant it in cold-black dirt and make it come up a "green" shoot...? when you can do that without God's help (He created the dirt, the seed and the water and Sun) then... I might listen to what your trying to say... Hebrews, Chapter 11...vs. 1 (Faith, the substance of things hoped for...the evidence of things unseen) ...(like the air you breath)

2007-07-29 21:46:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers