What is your opinion We fought our revolution, go back and fight yours," and "Stop the Invasion -- Go Home?

Answer 1

Yep, they need to back home...revolt against the corrupt governments of their home nations...and stop leeching off the US and our citizens.

Edit: If a million termites enter your home, you bring in exterminators before your house is damagely severely. Wanting deportation of illegal aliens before irreparable damage is done by millions is the same principle. Invasion on different scales. Oh and yes, my ancestors fought in the American Revolution. They also fought for Texas when a certain Mexican general got too big for his britches. My stepson flew back to Iraq today.

Answer 2

Honestly, this argument has been around for years, but why so much more now, than so in 1986? Possibly, due to Bush's policies and proclaimed involvement in his father's New World Order plans? See North American Union agreement (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Union).

President Eisenhower solved this problem under project Wet back (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_******* and http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/OO/pqo1.html) utilizing Public Law 78 (http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0885-3118%28196510%297%3A4%3C541%3APL7ATO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-3&size=LARGE&origin=JSTOR-enlargePage). This law deported thousands in one year while many others left prior to arrest.

The problem lies with drug cartels, big corporations, oil and ultimately, greed resulting from cheaper labor.
NAFTA, CAFTA and other free trade=SHAFTA for the American Economy.

The recent outcry stems from ill-educated Mexicans, being taught that the USA stole their land, which is untrue.
See American-Mexican war (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican-American_War).

The answers are simple, the reason is as plain as black and white. Research the history, Follow the money. Those whom don't learn from the past are destined to repeat it!

My assumption is that this crisis being brought out again now, is a smoke screen to cover a more ominous hidden agenda of Mexico, USA and Canada; and that is the North American Union. After all, in no other time of our history has one president ever, on his watch, had so much strife, chaos and cries for a new rebellion, than now!

If you want answers, follow the money!


Also yahoo answers will not allow the Project Wet Back link, claiming it is racial. No, it is the actual name of the project.

Wet back is a term for a Mexican or Central American who is in the United States illegally. The term is based on the presumption that the person in question swam or waded across the Rio Grande to get into the United States, getting his or her back wet in the process. "Wet back" may also be used as a blanket term to describe anyone of the Mestizo race, although this is less common. The English term was first used in 1920's and saw official use by the U.S. Government in 1954 with Operation Wet back. The Spanish-language translation espalda mojada — or, more tersely, mojado — is used in a similar sense by Hispanic Americans.

Answer 3

It makes a difference who's saying this -- because there would be many ways to interpret it.

But, assuming the message was by Americans objecting to illegal immigrants -- I'd say both messages are silly because they both miss the point. It's like trying to argue whether someone should paint their house blue or green, when the other person doesn't own a house at all.

Immigrants -- legal or otherwise -- aren't insurgents. They aren't trying to rebel -- so telling them to go fight their rebellion is meaningless, since they don't have a rebellion.

And calling it an invasion is just media hype -- it's using a word that carries an emotional charge, when the word (by its definition) has no bearing on the topic. You cannot have an invasion unless there is a single authority ordering it. And there isn't here.

Answer 4

Well there is some truths to it afterall if Mexicans ingaged in Revolution in Mexico they could get there officals to stop benefiting from drugs and end drugs or actually fight the war on drugs . After this they can get there economy up and have no reason to come to the U.S. because everything they would want would be in Mexico .

Answer 5

I like that. I think we should supply them all with the guns to do it.

Answer 6

I'm sorry but I didn't see you fight that war.And I didn't need glasses back then either.

Answer 7

well put..
i guess some of us think it's important to have freedom of incoherence.