the stork theory as an alternative to biological reproduction?
(with apologies to Judith Hayes)
2007-07-29 16:37:01 · 9 answers · asked by HawaiianBrian 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
And Intelligent Falling as an alternative to the Theory of Gravitation.
2007-07-29 16:40:55 · answer #1 · answered by qxzqxzqxz 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
A) Creationism is not nor will it ever qualify as a theory.
B) Evolution is a scientific theory - which means it is a fact that is supported by hundreds if not thousands of testable scenarios that have predicatable results.
C) The Stork too, is just a fairy tale and is on equal footing with creationism / Intelligent design.
I wish people would stop being stupid and pretending that a theory is the same as a hypothesis.
2007-07-29 23:54:33 · answer #2 · answered by Atrum Animus AM 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Here we have two contradicting concepts at first glance. The problem is when one set of ideas becomes so dogmatic that now allowance for new ideas can enter the dark chamber of immaturity and ignorance. For an evolutionist to say that creation is a farce while accepting the created nature of his situation in life as normal is just as bad as a creationist saying evolving matter and stuff aren't really evolving as if he didn't evolve into the being that he is. The denial factor is what is really happening here and in that it is just a game of words and personal interchanges for egotistical reasons that have nothing to do with any real understanding how the two work together.
2007-07-29 23:46:36 · answer #3 · answered by JORGE N 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Complete with a new museum of cool exhibits like the lucky stork that got to bring baby Jesus home and explains how the church has always had it in for those pesky storks so they omitted them out of the bible in an attempt to hide the truth.
2007-07-29 23:45:26 · answer #4 · answered by Dethklok 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course.. Otherwise protect young minds from the ill informed, ignorant, scientifically illiterate creationist trash they spew forth..
The whole world is getting very sick and tired of these creationist fruitcakes and the damage they do..!
Their judgement day may come sooner than they think..
2007-07-29 23:44:54 · answer #5 · answered by Commonancestor 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about we teach sarcasm and "1000 ways to drop out of high school your senior year" instead of math?
2007-07-29 23:43:55 · answer #6 · answered by Jay 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Creationism is a faith-based opinion and nothing more. It holds no scientific grounds and should be kept in the church.
2007-07-29 23:39:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
LOL!
I know Judith, and she's on target here - as usual!
2007-07-29 23:41:02 · answer #8 · answered by Brent Y 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
evolution is not fact. biological reproduction is... NEXT!
2007-07-29 23:42:36 · answer #9 · answered by Bl3ss3dw1thL1f3 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋