If you've said something like this i'm pretty sure you don't know the definition of the word theory.
If you think evolution is JUST a theory please read this:
http://www.notjustatheory.com/
and THEN answer.
2007-07-29 14:17:59 · 19 answers · asked by ChooseRealityPLEASE 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The above answers just go to show that even when you explain exactly what a theory is, and why evolution is such a good one, the Creationists will still stick their fingers in their ears and yell "I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"
For those who claimed that science has somehow "proven evolution wrong", by all means present your evidence. Right here. Right now. I'd love to see it.
2007-07-29 14:27:52 · answer #1 · answered by Scott M 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I've read it and it still matches what I knew about the word. A theory is not a fact. There have been many theories about the universe. One of them was that the world was flat and then there was the theory that the sun went around the earth. A theory just is not fact enough.
2007-07-29 21:22:41 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Yes evolution is just a theory...
...so is gravity, the structure of the atom, the big bang, General relativity, Continental drift... =P
2007-07-29 21:46:41 · answer #3 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is a theory. It will always be a theory. Do you think creation is JUST a theory? Are all theories wrong? Or are all theories correct? Should all theories be studied with an open mind? Or just one?
2007-07-29 22:29:25 · answer #4 · answered by John himself 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'll take a controversial theory over a faith inspired fantasy any day of the week.
2007-07-29 22:04:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Me, me!
But again, which theory of evolution - the one endorsed by Jay Gould or Dawkins ?
he, he
2007-07-29 21:21:58 · answer #6 · answered by defOf 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"A theory never becomes a law."
Thats because it is a THEORY. It CANT become a law, because it isnt proven. Nice play on words these people have here. They dont know what they are talking about. I am well-aware that evolution is NOT proven, call it what you want....
2007-07-29 21:24:49 · answer #7 · answered by Bl3ss3dw1thL1f3 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
It doesn't even qualify as a theory. It is the best that "science" can come up with to explain creation without a Creator. True scientific theories are not based on assumptions, nor do they conflict with known scientific laws, such as the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
2007-07-29 21:22:07 · answer #8 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 1⤊ 6⤋
So it doesn't even qualify as a theory then. Thanks for pointing out that evilution doesn't qualify because there have been no observation. No one was around then to document and since Darwin no one has observed a human losing his tail, or any such nonsense.
2007-07-29 21:28:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
A theory by any other name is............a theory. Dress it up any way you like. It remains a theory. One which has evidence to support it, but still a theory.
Does that disturb you?
It seems to .
2007-07-29 21:21:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋