English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is this what you know:
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bb2.html (from NASA)
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/seuforum/bb_whatwas.htm (from Harvard)
http://www.dailycal.org/sharticle.php?id=23699

Or do you know something else?

2007-07-29 13:36:07 · 22 answers · asked by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

22 answers

I have a good general idea of the Hot Big Bang. I am an old earther, so I believe God created this way. God spoke and the Big Bang happened.

2007-07-29 13:40:46 · answer #1 · answered by RB 7 · 2 3

That it supposedly happened 13.7 billion yrs. ago, from a single point (singularity) that was infinately dense. We have some knowledge all the way back to a few seconds after it happened, that it expanded at the perfect rate, not too fast, not too slow. If it expanded too fast, it would have been strewn about like dropping a bowl of mm's, if it expanded too slow, it would have collapsed back in on it's self. I wish I knew some more.....Edit: I didn't read your links, because I'm already reading a similar book, don't feel like reading it over again.

2007-07-29 13:48:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The "big bang" is interesting, no doubt, but it leaves me asking the questions: Why should we seek a beginning point at all when the lifelessness of inorganic matter, space and energy seem not to need one? Why doesn't our notion of infinity serve us as the ultimate answer to understanding the plasticity of our universe?

I'm inclined to believe that if there is evidence of one "big bang" there may be evidence of others preceding it and that it ought to be thought of somewhat like we consider hurricanes within our Earth's atmosphere.

[][][] r u randy? [][][]
.

2007-07-29 17:09:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There was no big bang. The early universe contained more matter than space, and therefore time was much slower, since you know about relativity. The farther back you look, oh what the hell do I know.

As for creationism, I have already written to two foremost creationists and told them I want to pee on them.

2007-07-29 13:42:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

The big bang, isn't that like imagining your library exploding and kaplunk the Webster dictionary was the result of it. Perfect order will not happen as the result of disorder @
chaos. The universe and all its seemingly infinite detail that all works together perfectly screams out loudly of wisdom and design which came from an infinite and almighty creator (GOD).

2007-07-29 14:20:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It is when Atum "spat forth" himself into the Nu.

And when the AUM caused a lotus to spring from Vishnu's belly button.

It is when Eurynome coupled with Ophion to produce Eros.

We've known about this for æons.

2007-07-29 13:48:19 · answer #6 · answered by Hooded Voodoo 2 · 0 2

Genesis 1:1 (KJV)
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

2007-07-29 13:42:45 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 2 2

They're just going to ignore it because it actually takes work to understand it. Makes me frightened for the fate of the world.

2007-07-29 13:45:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

That it is merely a theory and that if there was actually a big bang then God made that too.

2007-07-29 13:42:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I learned about the big bang and science when I was in high school. Now I know the Truth and that's not it.

Hope this helps!

2007-07-29 13:43:34 · answer #10 · answered by Alien Brain 3 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers