Well whatever your position on 9/11, the fact remains that within 2 weeks of other major disasters, there was a formal investigation announced. Pearl Harbor, JFK, the space shuttles, hurricane Katrina--all within 2 weeks, most within a week. It took 411 days for there to be an "official investigation" into 9/11....an event that killed over 3000 innocent people, in broad daylight, on American soil, with all the cameras rolling. 411 days!!
Forget about that though, take a look at what was spent on the effort once it finally got rolling vs. something like, say, the Clinton Administration's screw ups.
Cost of investigating the Clintons for Whitewater and semen on the dress of Monica?......about $65 million
Cost of the 500+ page 9/11 Commission's report?.....about $15 million
Comparatively speaking, something is wrong here folks. It's kind of tough to believe that the facts have been completely fettered out for $15M. In fact, it's REALLY tough.
And so, we're left to the confusion and fear of not knowing the truth--exactly the state that governments and terrorists want us to be in. Propaganda is a powerful thing in the hands of people that know how to use it--that's been proven over and over. Next to organized religion, propaganda has killed more people than anything man has ever invented.
There are a LOT of unanswered questions about 9/11 and anyone that thinks otherwise has had WAY too much Koolaide. Americans have the freedom to ask questions and every American should until the truth is revealed. It hasn't been so far....so keep asking.
2007-07-28 07:03:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
While the Pentagon may have been an inside job (that has some far more plausible theories behind it than the World Trade Centers), the World Trade Centers most certainly weren't.
1) Controlled demolitions would've resulted in an implosion, which didn't happen with the World Trade Centers. You can view an implosion video almost anywhere (pretty much any professional demolition inside of a city of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City...which likely was an inside job).
2) I doubt we have the technology yet to adequately remote control a plane from lift-off and collision with the World Trade Centers.
3) There was nothing NORAD could've done, short of issuing orders for Air Force, Navy, or Marine Corps pilots to shoot down the airliners.
Like all conspiracies, it's only partially thought through and rather poorly at that without any evidence to back it up that can't be dismissed easily by anyone with common sense.
2007-07-28 12:04:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by theREALtruth.com 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I cannot address points 2 and 3, but I can say that point 1 appears to be true.
Steven Jones has laid out some facts supporting the demolition theory for the three buildings that collapsed in NYC on 9/11/2001 and these facts have not been refuted. The challenges to his paper that I've seen are incompetent.
If points 2 and 3 are true, then we have some serious problems in our government and in the media that collaborates with this lie. Regardless of whether the government was deliberately inept or just inept, there are bad apples in our government that have not been removed from service. In fact, they have been promoted!
The modus operandi of the US government has been:
"Why tell the truth when a good lie will do?"
Spin seems to be the operative word: "Perception is reality."
This attitude feeds consipiracy theories and the perpetuation of inept management in government.
2007-07-28 12:21:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Skeptic 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
You first have to decide for your self and not to sound rude but get educated in the areas that either prove or disprove the theory's . The attack did happen and the planes were manned buy normal people and there familys now miss them so out the door with the idea of remote planes. I am doing alot of studie on this subject myself and i gotta tell ya i have found so much information both pro and con it is impossible to explain here. So good luck and LOOK For the Loose change video. Work up from there there is tons of information.
2007-07-28 12:11:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by ASmiles1 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you know the answer lies right here in the following reference. I also think that you know the truth behind it all such as the Phoenix Program being utilized under the Homeland Security Act for Israel..........whoops I mean Bush's family tree.
Moreover, research those that were actually not at work that day as it isnt a coincidence that the number of people missing that day was a record!
2007-07-28 12:04:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hindsight 20-20 blah blah. The truth hurts sometimes, U know. They were Saudi, we're not going to say that they were from Libya or Kenya or something. Okay, maybe Iraq, heh heh.
Wasn't Bin Laden kicked out of Saudi Arabia?
2007-07-28 11:56:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Crazy H 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Some people really believe
a) Elvis is alive
b) Tupac is alive
c) Napoleon Dynamite was killed in a car accident
d) Mikey (life cereal) died when his stomach exploded after mixing pop rocks and soda.
e) We (US) saw an opportunity to wage war when the World Trade Center was attacked, so we quickly arranged to have a plane fly towards the Pentagon and blew it up.
The problem is, some people are morons.
2007-07-28 12:19:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dr 8'lls 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I just want to know how the Government was able to place all those charges in the buildings and hide the miles of wires, tons of explosives from all the people that worked in the buildings. I mean, they would have to do some cutting to get to certain structural joints, cut to make area weaker etc...
Inside job my backside!
2007-07-28 12:09:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Colonel 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
This is a fabrication by people who can't deal with great tragedy and instead choose to blame it on a story that better fits there political point of view, it is a lie.
2007-07-28 11:58:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Greg 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
SOMETHING about 9/11 isn't being told, that's what started these ill-fitting facts.
We will NEVER find out which part has been a lie.
Terrorists DID preform the attack, but something has been done using the attack as a coverup.
Conclusion? The goverment lies to its people, but we already knew that.
It's just that the lie has to do with an attack that killed so many people is making this whole thing scary as hell.
edit: weird, negative score... but for wich part of my answer?
I mean, the goverment does lie on multiple occasions. That can't be it.
The statement we'll never find out? People vote me down because I think we'll never find out? I'm confused here.
2007-07-28 11:58:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by vernes 4
·
0⤊
5⤋