desertification by agriculture and over grazing
urbanisation
the production of Ethanol
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AkIpAKU3em1t9e.RH2xfurPsy6IX?qid=20070611164235AAp1H6V
deforestation
water shortage
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmmHErYHM7B.LVtVgv7uxijsy6IX?qid=20070628134210AAuQYQr
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AkIpAKU3em1t9e.RH2xfurPsy6IX?qid=20070629101716AATW9R0
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Al1myxKxoBlCEkcDcePs1k7sy6IX?qid=20070706213344AAFjM9s
2007-07-28 14:46:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Some reference to the Permian extinction would convey the magnitude of the changes that are rapidly approaching. Pointing out that we've changed the climate as much in the last 100 years as nature has in any 1000 year period, adn most hundred million year periods. It's nice to see that other countries are not as selfish and blind as the USA. Maybe they can find a way to get America to stop peeing in the pool.
2007-07-28 03:32:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
"climate change is not a new phenomenon and has occurred intermittently throughout the history of our planet"
I'm not saying we can't do anything about it, but it would seem to me that climate change is being blamed on man. However environmentalists and governments want us to change our ways. Oil production is the single biggest contributor (supposedly) for rapid development of climate change, yet no-one appears to be putting too much pressure on oil companies to find a new organic/carbon free fuel. Perhaps if governments were not so greedy, we would have a new fuel by now.
2007-07-28 02:40:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by deadmeatuk2 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
perhaps a couple of visuals (might be better if you do it on powerpoint as a slideshow) on how the climate change affect the environment, the people and almost every living thing. interview a couple of folks around you and ask how do they feel about the global warming (and videotape each of the participants). i think your project will look really good if you get as much information as you could get your hands into to make it even more interesting. just as long as you state the fact about the subject...everything will go smoothly. good luck on your project.
2007-07-28 02:32:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by kittykat 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
you might want to refer to America's studies by their NASA of climatic warming ...
especially the ones that show warming on Mars and Neptune in the last few decades -- neither of which can possibly be caused by the activities of humanity. [google will find them for you]
***
There is an ancient observation that the most effective argument is one that fully attests to both sides of an issue and then arrives at a logical conclusion about the quality of evidence, chain of reasoning, and risks of taking possible courses of action.
If you act like so many lads coming out of the government schools and make only one side of the case, every well educated person will recognize the flaws in your thinking and schooling. I rather doubt you'll get into University doing that.
GL
2007-07-28 03:46:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Spock (rhp) 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
So many directions that can me taken with this topic:
- The impacts on plants and animals.
- Weather patterns
- Fresh water impact
- Ocean Current Flow
- Capitolism vs The environment
2007-07-28 02:31:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by TheSafetyDude1079 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i won't be able to help yet be reminded, as quickly as I study lots of the above solutions, of the "coach the communicate" crap that creationists got here up with to argue that smart layout could learn in faculties. Giving the different ingredient "honest" time and "equivalent" time are 2 thoroughly diverse procedures. in case you opt to contain training that promotes a skeptical view of AGW, then make certain you observe scrutiny to make optimistic that the arguments you're offering are subsidized via examine, no longer blogs; are logical and evidential, no longer fallacy. in spite of the undeniable fact that, for commonly used matters, regardless of expert-agw or skeptical viewpoints, you are able to communicate: - comments approaches - various different variables that impression climate besides the greenhouse result, alongside with photograph voltaic output, albedo, aerosols, Milankovith cycles, so on - previous climate alterations, and what drove them - effects of world warming For pictures or perchance ingredients for some sturdy information, you may could specify for us what that's which you will contain on your undertaking, and what you have already. to illustrate, do you choose pictures for the physics of the greenhouse result? Carbon cycle? previous climate alterations? Temperature? i could desire to probable locate some for you yet you will could, back, specify what you need.
2016-10-13 00:07:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by riva 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
America's addiction to oil and globalization making everyone in developed countries addicted to oil...
Yes, climate change has always existed but ppl need to stop denying that we have no impact on it this time...
2007-07-28 02:51:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This website will be of help. Pictures, graphs, scientific data, links to other sites:
http://profend.com/global-warming/
2007-07-28 04:31:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bob 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
causes, consiquences, reponces (local and global)
reduce, reuse and recycle
case studies
social, economic, political
corporate responsability
carbon credits
g8
kyoto principle, rio decleration and all that jazz
2007-07-28 03:48:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need to research CHEMTRAILS , just look there, before you bother with the other smokescreen.
2007-07-28 09:53:06
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋