No, because there is no constitutional right to privacy of information. Additionally, unless you have incurred damages as a result of this you cannot collect anything.
Also, driving is not a right, it is a privelege. As a condition of this privelege, you must provide the state with information such as this.
Do everyone a favor and don't be another frivolous lawsuit
2007-07-27 06:37:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by adf 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Any dogs is a ability lawsuit. i believe dogs knowledgeable by skill of the common dogs proprietor for defense are a lots greater risk of biting in an irrelevant project. A professionally knowledgeable protection dogs isn't. of course, we've been refused coverage on our living house by skill of one organization because of fact one dogs is a K9. It has not something to do with breed, the comparable organization quoted us while we had in simple terms one GSD and one Lab. i understand what is going into protection education for Police K9s, and Schutzhund, yet i don't understand what is going into PPD or the way it differs from that form of educating. i'm additionally involved. For reference, right here the K9 course is 12 weeks lengthy, Monday to Friday. It includes obedience, monitoring and protection. The dogs are then knowledgeable weekly for something of their occupation and recertified each and every twelve months. the dep. right here keeps exact logs of educating the K9s have won. if that's the point of educating, or loss of, is ever called into question those questions would properly be solutions. K9 education is often challenged as extreme use of tension and court docket circumstances are difficulty-loose. i don't evaluate Schutzhund protection education. particular, the dogs are knowledgeable to chew, yet in particular situations. Many does not "guard" in a real project (not announcing all). No, i does not see the dogs as unreliable if it grew to become into shot. As you set it, it fairly is alerting you and supplying you with time to react. i don't think of it has as lots to do with adventure, it fairly is greater approximately education (of the guy).
2017-01-03 03:46:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
FOI prohibits certain information from being seen on these reports when someone wants to obtain one the persons personal data is blocked out.
nice try though
2007-07-27 06:25:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by rob c 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did you know that the police department in Orange County, CA is outsourcing their data entry to Mexico with our personal info?
Already there are problems...
But I think you go overboard...lawsuits like this cause things like, not having you d.l. checked when you go to vote because it infringes on your personal rights, which means that anybody can say they are anybody.
2007-07-27 06:27:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by lc 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No you wouldn't have a law suit unless you could prove you had identy theft by them being careless with your information.
2007-07-27 06:26:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by wish I were 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Law enforcement can obtain all that from ones DL or by checking the registration or from the license plate number.
It's all available to them.
You might win a lawsuit...........................................................
when pigs fly.
2007-07-27 06:28:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by ed 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont know bout that but since ur in credit lending i have a few questions if u are open to it.
2007-07-27 06:54:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by chaos3000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You do not have a case.You have an option to either use your SS# for your drivers license or not.
2007-07-31 06:15:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by james m 5
·
0⤊
0⤋