That maybe God created both evolution and creation both for a reason? yes we are going to look like monkeys, we cant have been the only thing God created to look kind of like us, and yes we all come from the same line, God made us all. Maybe the monkey was a practice test.
2007-07-26 15:09:18 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No. To say God used evolution goes against what He says in His Word. I would rather believe in His Word.
2007-07-26 15:12:31 · answer #1 · answered by Fish <>< 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Cindy, Cindy, Cindy.
Evolution is a myth.
The proof is in the fact that there is NO unified theory of evolution. NONE.
Biological evolutionary theory violates the rules of AstroPhysical evolutionary theory; which violates the rules of Paleontological evolutionary theory.
There isn't enough "time" and "energy" (which are actually two parts of the same thing) in the universe for the billions of years needed to allow all of the random chance failures. you would need biology to work right on the first chance at every turn for it to work. Which means it isn't random, it's designed. If it's designed, it isn't evolution.
You need to actually read and learn what these guys are saying. Evolution is the new religion. It's a big religious business. The science involved violates their suppositions over and over, but they will not release their theory because when they do - the whole thing falls apart.
God is.
2007-07-26 22:19:12 · answer #2 · answered by TEK 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem with both evolutionism and creationism at the same time is that evolution makes creation unnecessary. Theists claim that god created humans, and have no rational evidence behind it; evolutionists claim that we evolved, and we have a lot of evidence for it. If evolution is true (it almost certainly is) then belief in god is unnecessary.
2007-07-26 22:23:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How very interesting. I have never heard that take before.
I don't understand why people have a difficult time with there being an organism that looks like us and seems to be closely related to us. If we were all created by God there should be some similarities.
2007-07-26 22:13:20 · answer #4 · answered by biology.teacher 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So if the monkey was a practice case (not that I agree) how would that be any different than evolution in terms of our relatedness to monkeys?
2007-07-26 22:13:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Theory of Evolution is a working hypothesis.
It makes sense of all the different creatures found over time.
As we learn more about DNA, we can unravel the mystery.
But the key question is how did everything start from nothing.
2007-07-26 22:15:37 · answer #6 · answered by Robert S 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
> Maybe the monkey was a practice test.
But what if humans were the practice test and monkeys are the final product?
Wait, that's silly, squirrels are the final product.
2007-07-26 22:12:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Maybe.
But evolution is a satisfactory explanation by itself.
Why throw an unprovable assumption (god) into the mix, when it is unnecessary?
2007-07-26 22:15:41 · answer #8 · answered by Dark-River 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think God needs practice. And you can't have evolution and creationism ( I assume that's what you mean), that would mean Earth is God's diorama.
2007-07-26 22:12:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I just can't figure out why people want so badly to identify with a monkey, ape, caveman...whatever!
http://www.ldolphin.org/wmwilliams.html
2007-07-26 22:13:48 · answer #10 · answered by drivn2excelchery 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋