Did you know if a monkey was seen giving birth to a human, it would disprove evolution?

Question

It is the same the with the crockaduck.
Evolution actually specifically disallows this possibility, because evolution requires gradual changes to occur over millions of years.

So if you want to disprove evolution, you should be out there hunting for these things.

even punctuated equilibrium requires a lot of time. Maybe not millions of years but certainly longer than one or two generations.

Answer 1

i think it would bring up questions of who was alone with the monkey ...

Answer 2

Edit: Removed my harsh words for clarity.
No it would not disprove evolution. They would be hybrids which happens ALL the time. Has anyone ever seen a mule or a liger? If people don't know your examples are impossible b/c of differing chromosomal numbers. SHEESH The thing I hate most about teaching science in the Bible Belt is that Fundies can't shut up and top whining long enough to learn! Evolution cannot be disprove. The THEORY of NATURAL SELECTION could be and might be one day. EVOLUTION IS A FACT! Ever taken antibiotics, stopped before the course was done and then got sick again? NATURAL SELECTION! The bacteria with natural resistance to the antibiotic survived and the genetic frequency was changed. Voila! EVOLUTION!

Evolution is defined as a change in the gene pool of a population over time. The time can be short or long. Natural selection has many parts, I won't get into them here b/c that is more suited to a science forum. But it basically says those individuals with the 'better' suited genetics in a certain situation survive and pass on their genetics to the next generation.

Answer 3

Maybe it would, but then it would also disprove creationism, would it not? It would also bring into question, "Who the F*CK did this with a MONKEY?" But that's besides the question, but the answer I'm going for is...no it wouldn't, we've seen freak things happen in science before, (such as the first evidence of subatomic particles) and I'd hate to say it to you, but that is physical impossibility (unless this child was created in a lab because of gene splicing or what-not) So I'm sorry to 'disprove' you but that IS (naturally) impossible. And yes, evolution does require gradual changes to occur over a long period of time (us humans only took a couple thousands, not millions) but if you're saying that a monkey CAN bear a human child, then why don't the women who have bestiality without a condom and who actually (well finish off inside, for lacks of a better term) not get pregnant, even WHEN they sometimes do it with monkeys (VERY disturbing news report...ew...)

Answer 4

Have you seen some people that are born that are freakishly tall or short? and no one in their family history is like that? What do you call that? Evolution begins with mutations, and those mutations are not readily or easily seen. The DNA molecule is a map that is still being charted.

And there is a couple in the Middle East that gave birth to children who cannot stand up. They walk all their lives (go about their daily business) on their hands and feet.

Answer 5

In fairness, there is the punctuated equilibrium hypothesis. But you're right, with regard to the general theory of evolution (with phyletic gradualism) that's widely accepted.

You're right, a monkey giving birth to a human would not be compatible with punctuated equilibrium either.

Answer 6

If you are seriously searching for a monkey that will give birth to a human, then disproving evolution is the least of your problems.

Answer 7

Hello, Reaper:

I heard that Church Norris is living proof that God's-image-man is evolving into monkeys.

Actually, Satan admits he uses evolution to negate the plan of redemption. It's in Roger Morneau's biography written after he escaped from a spirit-worship cult.

Select www.revelado.org/cult.htm If you don't have time to read the whole document, then word search for "Darwin."

Shalom, peace in Jesus, Ben Yeshua

Answer 8

only if one could rule out artificial implantation of an embryo genetically engineered to be compatible with a monkey womb...

such a thing would be an anomaly but would not invalidate all the rest of the evidence for evolution. if it could be shown that it happens spontaneously under certain conditions that would perhaps be a different story.

Answer 9

Same I think people who believe in that should also join instead of making up fancy books or whatever on it. I have not seen a monkey looking human yet. If were so close why not let them into are homes you know get to know each other better.

Thanks Leeboy for understandding the truth of it am not even talking about God terms or bible stuff but common sense.

Answer 10

Genesis 1:25  And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

"...after their kind...", this means that each animal was an individual specie. Pretty sophisticated ideas for an unsophiscated time.

Therefore, we are not the ones with a need to hunt for these imaginary beasts.

GOD bless

Answer 11

Did you know that if a chicken lays an egg, it disproves evolution? On the other hand, if an egg produces a chicken, it disproves evolution. Which came first? Quite a problem for the evolutionist isn't it?