I am convinced that the present leadership of the Democratic party has sold out to big business. That's why they keep nominating candidates who can't win. Gore the Bore put America to sleep. Ketchup Kerry was even worse. Now, the have Hillary and Obama "duking it out" over who is more irresponsible. This whole thing is staged, folks.
2007-07-25 22:21:26 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Well if you don't vote for her she'll make you disappear like a whitewater wittness.
2007-07-25 22:47:46 · answer #1 · answered by Erik S 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No--the "decoy" belongs to the "Lame-Duck" and Hillary is on target. The Democratic Leadership has it's foot in the door with the American people and a Democrat will be elected.
Hillary and Obama are hardly "duking it out" -- the gloves will come off however--hope the Republicans can provide a challenger.
2007-07-26 05:47:45 · answer #2 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Here is the question I posted yesterday regarding your very question today:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"The kind of homogenization that politicians go through before they become presidential contenders means that most of them will not have the strength of character to withstand the corrupting pessures. The emergence of Political Action Committees (PAC's) that finance presidential campaigns has meant that only candidates who have compromised themselves to powerful interest groups become presidential contenders. Having already compromised themselves, such people may not have the inner strength of character to deal with the exhilarating atmosphere of the White House"......from "Inside The White House" by Ronald Kessler, page 255.
My question to you is: Are there any Presidential candidates out there currently who have NOT compromised themselves to powerful interest groups? Your thinking, please !!
2007-07-26 08:58:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
In 2003 Howard Dean was the Democratic Leader in the polls and fund raising. See any similarities?
2007-07-26 05:49:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. Seems Hillary had her eye on the prize since she was in the White House the first time.
2007-07-26 10:25:23 · answer #5 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep - can't win. Gore got more votes remember? And Hillary is way in front in the polls.
2007-07-26 05:46:14 · answer #6 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no. this is a run for the roses friend. the first woman president ever in america. hilly has a lot of firsts to her credit. and after 100 years of sufferage it's about time women break the strangle-hold nasty old white men have on the presidency.
not my first choice, i'll support hilly's run 100% if she gets the nomination, and i have little doubt she will.
it is time for the pendulum to swing back the other way; enough of this fascist experiment!
2007-07-26 05:34:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Steve, I think you may be computer generated...as you keep on pumping out question after question about the Clintons.....or you are just really dumb. She is the next President....it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that.
2007-07-26 05:31:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
i dont think so...
Hillary is clearly the leading presidential candidate, and the person to beat.
she has a clear majority over other democrats, and over most republicans.
2007-07-26 05:24:21 · answer #9 · answered by Carlo_ice 3 · 3⤊ 6⤋