Why shouldn't Barbara and Jenna go to the front lines of Iraq? Plus all the congress sons and daughters who support the war? I bet if that was the case, they would make an effort to bring the troops home faster.....
2007-07-25 16:04:34 · 26 answers · asked by TOP CONTRIBUTOR - FEMALE ORGASMS 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I love you. YES, good question, WHY shouldn't precious little Barbara and Jenna go to the front lines in Iraq? Exactly, and all of the congresses sons and daughters who support the *war*- can we bring in Karl Rove, Cheney, and maybe even Bush ?(he could play in the puppet shows, since he's doing that here now already...)
2007-07-25 16:14:59 · answer #1 · answered by PURR GIRL TORI 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
why are you still blaming bush all the democrats who were recently elected said they would bring the troops home as soon as possible an have yet to do so blame them they made promises and not keeping them. As for sending the twins and other elected officials kids to iraq they can go if they under their own choice joined the armed forces although it would be like prince harry they would be kept home for the safety of the other troops. Lets bring back the draft and send all kids of whatever group the president belongs to serve in wars or whatever comes up during their term. When the new president is elected and the new party is in power all the former party troops come home and the new groups kids go for their 4 or 8yr term. and we disbaned the small parties so everyone counts no green party or anything else its republican or democrat nothing else
2007-07-25 23:18:18 · answer #2 · answered by topgunpilot22 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is one of my favorite examples of Liberal Logic!
The Bush Twins are ADULTS and old enough to decide for themselves whether they want to go to Iraq or not. If they weren't old enough, they'd be too young to enlist. All that is moot anyway because parents can't legally force their offspring into the military.
But using your logic - since Chelsea Clinton didn't go to Kosovo, I don't see why Bush's daughters should be required to fight in Iraq.
2007-07-26 01:56:43 · answer #3 · answered by Eukodol 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Shove it. No, they shouldn't. No one forced the troops to enlist. They did so of their own accord for their own reasons. You got a problem with the war, too bad. It's happening and no amount of "well bush should be over there" is gonna change that.
2007-07-25 23:12:40 · answer #4 · answered by Alecto 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just to let you know, we now have an all volunteer force.
Even when we didn't, people were not sent to the front line just because some dimwit on Yahoo! thought they should go.
Also, it may surprise you to learn that there really aren't any "front lines".
2007-07-25 23:11:03 · answer #5 · answered by open4one 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
For the same reason the British Prince Edward, or whatever his name is, who tried to go to Iraq. He would be a target and cause anyone around him to be in greater danger.
2007-07-25 23:11:41 · answer #6 · answered by howdigethere 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you go to the front line. If you don't like what's happening in the US, move to Iraq with your brethren.
Oh, and take Michael Moore with you. Freedom isn't free.
2007-07-25 23:18:57 · answer #7 · answered by Charlie D 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That is the problem. There is no front line in this war.
2007-07-25 23:12:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We need to find a way to bring soldiers home safely, putting people like that on the line would only get more good guys killed.
2007-07-25 23:07:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
HOW ABOUT ALL THE DEMOCRATIC SENATOR THAT VOTED FOR THE WAR SHOULD THEY ALSO SEND THEIR KIDS? I DIDN'T SEE CHELSEA AT THE CONTROLS OF TOMAHAWK MISSILE WHEN CLINTON TRIED TO SAVE FACE BY LOBBING A FEW MISSILE INTO AFGHANISTAN. REMEMBER HE BLEW UP AN ASPIRIN FACTORY.
2007-07-25 23:08:42 · answer #10 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋