do you feel bad for the people that didnt live on the titanic i watched it this morning and omg the ending was horrible every body was in that freezing water and they died exept that one lady because she wasnt really in the water.... i think that was horrible!!!
2007-07-25 13:12:52 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
everybody did die for some of you that said that they didnt die some lived some didnt because they were in the freezing water rose didnt because she was on that thing... I have a question... Do they find the necklace? Why did she let him go in the water? And why did that lady put her kids asleep when she knew the titanic was going to sink?
2007-07-26 02:19:31 · update #1
1 more question why did the owner of the ship want to die you could of telled he wanted to die he started heading for the water and practiclly killed himself but the water did
2007-07-26 02:22:18 · update #2
OMGSH! I LOVE THAT MOVIE!!! i feel terrible for all of the people that died on the titanic in real life...over 1500 people went down with the ship, including captain smith...
in the movie, the old lady drops the necklace into the water b/c it came from cal...she wanted to get rid of her bad memories..the man on the boat never did find the necklace tho.....watch this clip..it looks really good, but it is NOT real!:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD4OnHCRd_4
the lady let the kids to sleep b/c she knew that they wouldnt be able to escape to survive...i know, its really sad but she didnt want the kids to worry...and what owner are you talking about? captain smith or mr andrews?? probably mr andrews huh? he wanted to go down with the ship that he created and he was sad that it was his fault that everyone would die..remember how he told rose he was sorry he didnt build her a better ship?? that tells you why....
1 more thing! i HATE how people always laugh about it...it isnt anything funny!
2007-07-26 08:32:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course I feel bad! But as I've always thought, you can't go swimming in the ocean without the company of the shark, or flying in a rocket to the moon? Geez! u gotta expect a bit of something to go wrong, hey?
So, like all inventions,... it usually has just a normal human being behind the whole idea. If you know what I mean. Even experts can be wrong. All those people on the Titanic just took it on themselves to believe that some dude invented an unsinkable ship.... Maybe they were silly to believe that someone could build such a boat?...And then drive it through ice burg infested waters..........
Also, watch 'Open Water', it's real freaky!....
...I do feel sorry, but a lesson must be learnt in this too, hey?
2007-07-25 22:26:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
an outstanding purchase. The R.M.S. vast replace into the sister of two different British White celebrity Liners competeing with Cunard Line's Mauertania and Lusitania. Her sister ships the HMHS Britanic, initially named the huge till components rights have been lost whilst it sunk and the RMS Olympic. The vast set sail on April 10th, 1912 for her maiden voyage led by skill of the properly enjoyed Captain Edward John Smith approximately to retire. It sunk after magnificent an iceberg interior the freezing Atlantic, April fifteenth, 1912. The survivors have been picked up by skill of the Carpathia, i've got forgotten its info. The vast did ruin in 2 between the 0.33 and fourth funnels, (the fourth smokestack funnel on the strict conclusion replace into certainly a faux. built to rigidity length). i ought to pass on perpetually. The action picture replace into based upon info, employing Kate Winslet as Rose DeWitt Bukater at 17 years of age, and Leonardo DiCaprio as Jack Dawson, at two decades of age. Accuracy performed an substantial function interior the director James Cameron's plan.
2016-11-10 07:48:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A very tragic piece of disaster history. All though the movie may not have followed the facts to the tee. The shock value of the movie was right on top !! Very sad indeed !!
2007-07-25 17:20:38 · answer #4 · answered by iambettyboop 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is a very good movie, but she was not the only one that lived, there were a few others that lived, but she was the one that told the story! There were even babies that died in the frigid waters it was very sad :-(
2007-07-25 13:50:26 · answer #5 · answered by mickey_112404 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I always thought the ending of that movie was dumb -- I mean, Rose is floating on something, Jack's in the water and too stupid to find something to climb up and keep himself from dying of hypothermia. He could have climbed on top of ROSE, for cryin' out loud! His death was meaningless and pointless. James Cameron did it to make Jack seem all noble for staying with Rose till the bitter end.
In "real" life, everybody DIDN'T die.
2007-07-25 13:20:21 · answer #6 · answered by Resident Heretic 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
It was a terrible tragedy.....the movie is a fictional love story being depicted in an historical event.
2007-07-25 13:21:09 · answer #7 · answered by Zombie Birdhouse 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree its soo very sad for think all those people who lost their lives and i think its horrible that they made it to where the first class people got to get on the life boats first.
2007-07-25 15:25:54 · answer #8 · answered by Nance 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was a bad way to die, but is there really a good way?
2007-07-25 13:43:23 · answer #9 · answered by Busan-man 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It was really sad, I think that wass the first movie that ever made me cry, It was so bad when jack died. wait that was his name right?
2007-07-25 13:34:25 · answer #10 · answered by forever_if_in_silence 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋