I am not sure if the best thing for us to do at this juncture is elect an actor into the highest office in the land. The last time we did this with Reagan, we had mixed results. From my understanding of Arnold’s positions, he sustains the typical Republican platform that mandates a militant reaction to most global conflicts.
As we have seen in our global “War on Terror”, or incursion into Iraq, and our history in Vietnam, guerilla wars, which is what this is, cannot be addressed through conventional militaristic means. We must fight this Islamic movement using counter intelligence measures, local law enforcement, and diplomacy. So far, Arnold’s rhetoric has been one that supports military solutions to everything.
Therefore, I don’t think he is an acceptable figure to helm the effort against worldwide Islamic militancy. The person we need to head this endeavor is one who is well versed in world affairs and the cultural dynamics that govern other parts of the world. In other words we need someone completely the opposite of men like Bush and Arnold, two men with a lot of machismo infused ignorance, but little strategic brilliance or cognizance of how the rest of the world works.
2007-07-28 05:44:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lawrence Louis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not. Our do nothing rat fink elected officials will not amend the constitution to protect the American flag, so they should never attempt something this foolish. There are enough qualified people born and raised in this country to fill the need, so keep the foreigners out of our politics.
Although I have to admit, as of yet I haven't seen too many worth the title of "president".
2007-07-25 20:07:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Arnold as a neo-con? Boy are you guys smoking the hippy lettuce. He'd be an interesting guy but I would not change the constitution for him to run. It's American born citizens for a reason. Jerking around with that is asking for problems
2007-07-25 20:04:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Deep Thought 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
I've got to say, I would highly consider moving to Austria if he's elected.
I'm not real comfortable with the direction our country is going. I heard some guy on the news, last night, refer to this Bush's reign of terror as an assault on our Constitution.
I think it's time we dump the Republican/Democrat stuff and remember we're ALL Americans. If we don't unite soon, our American Military Industrial Complex controlled government is going to roll over us all.
2007-07-25 20:05:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Leadfoot_Willie2.0 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
I do not want the law changed.It has always worked well here.
I like Arnold but again he does not have the experience to be President except married to a Kennedy. His accent is hard to understand at times.I think he is a good man but Keep the Law.
2007-07-25 20:08:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by ♥ Mel 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
He** no! On the first question. The second question; the constitution will never be changed to allow such a thing. On the third quedtion; He** no!
And I like Comrade's answer.
The truth is hard to swollow some times, it's a bitter pill, but it will make you feel better.
2007-07-25 20:29:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mr.D 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
NO, NO And AGAIN NO.
First at all, it's against the Constitution.
Second, he is trying to arrange the laws on his own convenience, remember, he can drive motorcycles WITHOUT driver's license, even having accidents, now he wants to run for President against the Constitution, no less.
Something smells fishy...watch out!
2007-07-25 20:07:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by crazyleon 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
First things first. It woult take a constitutional amendment to allow him to run.
And we need to think about this.
Do we want a President with divided loyalties?
It's one thing for the black to say they're "African-Americans", but what about someone who is truly an "Austrian-American"?
2007-07-25 20:17:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
1. Wait for an Amendment.
2. We are not in any mess.
3. I live in California and I like Arnold a lot.
Sorry, but if you think this country is in a mess now, you haven't been around very long...
2007-07-25 20:03:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ken C 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
I have friends in Cali, pretty liberal, and they have a pretty high opinion of the job he's doing. I actually think he would be a centrist, basically a slightly more conservative Bill Clinton. I don't think I'd vote for him, but I wouldn't dismiss him out of hand.
2007-07-25 20:15:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chance20_m 5
·
0⤊
2⤋