When abortion is outlawed are neocons going to stand in long lines to adopt these unwanted children?

Question

Are they going to pay for the formula and diapers and clothing they need?

Answer 1

Here is something that you intentionally choose to ignore.

"Neocons", if by that you mean conservatives, adopt children, and give to charities, at higher rates than liberals.

Now before you ask another intentionally biased question again, please at least minimally inform yourself.

Answer 2

Abortion is Holocaust plain and simple.
It is the ruthless murder of unborn people who deserve as much of a right to LIFE as the rest of us who have already been born.
And it isn't just a bunch of cells which haven't any feeling yet.
Unborn babies have just as much feeling as babies after they've been born.
How can someone say with all honesty that a baby whose 2 or 3 months along into gestation doesn't have any feelings?
They can't because it isn't true.
A friend of my husband said he was in the room with his girl friend when she was aborting their child and he could hear the baby scream as the doctor cut off parts of it's little body with a knife then removed them with forceps.
Abortion isn't pretty and the baby does feel pain before it dies especially due to the methods which are used to kill the child.
How can anyone justify killing an innocent baby whose inside her mothers womb where she feels safe and loved?
If abortion were outlawed then more women would be forced to behave in a more responsible way and not act like whores who don't care about what they do with their bodies.
And abortion isn't about the womans body it's about killing the unborn child's body.
If the woman cared so much for her body she wouldn't be placing herself at risk for diseases which could end her life by having unsafe sex.
The last thing I would ever want to do is sacrifice the life of my child for my own convenience and then try and justify it by saying it's my body when in fact it isn't it's the babies body which suffers the most.
What if we were to decide one day that we could abort a child after it's been born because it poses a financial burden or the child is affecting our health because of stress or lack of sleep etc.?
A mother would be able to take little 3 year old Johnny to the clinic and have his life ended thereby ending her problem with no questions asked.
If abortion became a thing of the past I can guarantee you that less women would get pregnant with unwanted children and use birth control instead such as the pill or some other form of contraceptive.
Or they might just stop have sex before marriage with anyone who shows the slightest interest in them.

Answer 3

There are a LOT of couples in the Us that want to adopt but get discouraged because of the long waits for a child.
So yes - there will be long lines of PARENTS too.

AND JUST MAYBE - the promiscuous tramps who use abortion as birth control will think twice and cross their legs more often. That would be GOOD for society - cuts down on the spread of disease too.

So you see, no more abortions is WIN/WIN for society!

Answer 4

The facts are that there are over 100 million children in the world that need adoption. And there are less than 200 thousand Americans willing to adopt. And there are thousands of babies at any one time that need adoption. http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/statistics/adoption.cfm
I guess the 98,800,000 children that will not be adopted can be added to the million or so children added after the change in the law.
The facts are simple, having kids to fill a supposed need for adoptive babies is a con game. And the cost to adopt can be as high as 40K each.
There is no honor in being pro life. It is a con game.
http://www.prolifeismurder.com

Answer 5

I'd like to see your evidence that no one wants these children??? Let's pretend for a second that you're right. It makes no difference. It's not our job to play God and kill innocent, unborn children. Even our Founding Fathers said that everyone should have the right to LIFE... Oh hey, you can post your stats and sources for us about no one wanting all those babies when Roe v. Wade is over turned.

Answer 6

lol. typical liberal thought process.
or lack thereof.
i know couples willing to adopt.
why is your solution about passing responsiblity off to someone else?
so you're independant and intelligent enough to have sex, unprotected at that, yet you didn't have the forethought to prepare for the consequences. hmm... oh, you did? abortion? great plan. be irresponsible and murder an innocent child.
adoption is a great alternative, but people need to come to reality, personal reality. your moral education shouldn't include professor hollywood.
people need to make decisions that make sense for everyone involved.
like it or not, abstinance is the only solution that effectively eliminates ALL negative outcomes.


...neocons making unwanted babies? you never had sex education did you? babies come from a male and a female who have...oh forget it. like the lights are on anyway...
...most aborted children ARE white from middle class families, nice try...

Answer 7

probably not, 99% of them don't want to do any work, like make life better so abortion isn't so highly desired.

day after day we all hear about homeless children, the terrible conditions in fostercare, and poverty- but what do neocons rally, cry, and get enraged about?
little groups of cells with no feelings being taken out of a uterus

having a abortion if its the best choice is being responicble- (having a abortion when there is a better option isn't) and for some abortion is the best* choice

( I sent this to someone but felt I should post this here as well)

1- non-white babies aren't adopted at the same rates as white babies

2- sick babies are rarely even adopted

3- abortion cuts the crime rate

4- most women don't use abortion as birth control. some use it when birth control fails, but not as the primary protection

5- less sex doesn't mean less disease. safer sex means less disease.

6- one of right lost means others can be lost as well. as a female I don't like any man telling me what to do with my body.

7- women will die from illegal abortions, rich women will get safe illegal abortions

8- one medical choice controlled by the government leads to more medical choices being choosen by the gov not the patient

abortion is not a win/win. not even close

Answer 8

Firstly, the demand for adopted children is so high that parents are willing to travel to other countries and endure those countries' adoption procedures just to take home a kid.

Secondly, I'm confused. So, do you think children should be killed in the womb just because they may or may not be wanted? Wow, that's seriously harsh. What's next, killing infants born to crappy parents?

Answer 9

it relatively is in basic terms attending to be ridiculous! commonly, i could say particular, because of fact i'm particular that many Conservative families could make room in the event that they could shop a life. yet i'm unwell and tired of the thought Liberals have that they seem to be a approach or the different entitled to do notwithstanding pleases them, and not stay with the ends up of their possibilities. wager what! If i'm going out and characteristic unprotected intercourse and get pregnant, I certainly have myself and my better half to blame. And myself and my better half extra suitable preserve the youngster we made, because of fact it is not all of us else's accountability.

Answer 10

so what your saying is that adoption is being used as a form of birth control? then why when that is brought up in debate do libs cry foul? we hear how it is about choice and the mothers health and her right, but if you use the birth control argument as opponent you get ridiculed and chastised.
if the mothers and fathers would keep their legs together, and their p****'s in their pants we wouldn't have to worry about the unwanted children. would we?