Osama bin Laden is the "prime suspect" in last Tuesday's terrorist attacks in New York and Washington and the United States wants to capture him , President Bush said Monday.
September 17, 2001
2007-07-25 11:27:35 · 13 answers · asked by Dangerous 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bin Laden for the US was not the prime suspect but the prime excuse the the Bush Administration to impose its ideas on other countries.
2007-07-25 11:31:39 · answer #1 · answered by emanyio712 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Nope he is a pawn one of many and as long as any terrorist organization goes unchecked there can never be any peace
FYI
I just turned 18 years old and I was in the Navy on liberty in Beirut Lebanon in 1966 when I was having a beer when a bomb was thrown into the bar and Americans were killed by terrorists BACK IN 66 and the USA did nothing what so ever at that time to take action (Democrap in office).
Israel had the 6 day war as the world sat back just like they did in WW 2 which by the way the French are known for watching then saying what should have been.
Until all these terrorist cells are neutralized there can be no peace.
If Osama was taken out when Clinton had him in the sights of a sniper then possibly the WTC would not have been attacked TWICE.
Clinton was informed they had bin Laden in their sights and he said do not shoot.
But he had no problem using his attack dog Janet shoot them up Reno to kill American citizens and then settle an out of court wrongful death.
This is not just one person that is causing all the ruckus it is a bunch of extremists who have no problem killing their own children for their cause against humanity.
This is Jimmy Carters war continuation
2007-07-25 11:48:03 · answer #2 · answered by Navy Vet 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Here's what happened:
The Democrats surrendered to bin Laden, and are now supporting him.
Bill Clinton saved bin Laden's life 8 times in order to become his friend.
Laden was too smart for that. He knew what happened to dozens of Bill's friends, including Vince Foster.
2007-07-25 11:42:18 · answer #3 · answered by wolf 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I suppose on 9/17/2001 it was still meaningful to talk about 'suspects.'
2007-07-25 11:33:19 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Shouldn't this be under the heading "Current Events"?
2007-07-25 11:39:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush is the prime suspect
2007-07-25 11:33:04 · answer #6 · answered by somber 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋
One could ask; Who was Oliver North and how did he impact the Iranian agenda?
2007-07-25 11:44:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cheney looks more of a prime suspect to me.
but who knows
2007-07-25 11:30:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
He is living in a cave i think.
The man has been marginalized!
2007-07-25 11:32:33 · answer #9 · answered by PNAC ~ Penelope 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Wish we could make things that simple for you.
2007-07-25 11:41:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋