You have received a hoax e-mail. They circulate every summer. Loads of people must get them because Yahoo! Answers gets loads of questions on this subject.
Once upon a time a long time ago (about 60,000 BC) there was a close approach of Mars to Earth of about 34.5 million miles..
Mars did not come that close to Earth again until 27th August 2003. That was worth remarking upon as a memorable occasion and received publicity. These occasions are called perihelic oppositions.
Mars (magnitude -2.9) was marginally brighter than Jupiter (magnitude -2.8) on that date in 2003. However Venus which is both larger than Mars and nearer than Mars is (as you might expect) always brighter than Mars and varies between magnitude -3.8 and - 4.6.
So the statement in the e-mail that Mars is about to become the brightest planet in the night sky is untrue.
The hoaxers do not know much about astronomy. They just sensationalise and distort the limited facts they have managed to pick up without properly understanding them or their implications.
As Venus has never been seen as large as the Moon and Venus is always brighter than Mars, it follows that Mars will not be seen to be as large as the Moon not on 27th August nor at any other time.
The naive belief that it "could be" that large this time just reveals the hoaxers' lack of understanding of how the Sun's gravity keeps the planets in stable orbits, which means the extent to which they vary in their positions is calculable and predictable.
Humanity has been studying and predicting the planets and their orbits for 4,000 years and writing their findings up in almanacs and suddenly someone comes along and declares "an unexpected dramatic change in a stable orbit is about to occur", wlthout explaining why that should be so. And expects to be believed!?
So the hoaxers do not understand how the Sun's gravity regulates and forces planets into stable orbits and how that makes the calculating and prediction of planetary orbits possible and how humanity has done just that for 4,000 years and developed theories to explain planets' behaviour, As part of understanding some order and pattern in that behaviour and in the universe,
The hoaxers however seem to be suggesting that planets behave unpredictably and chaotically without any pattern or sense to that behaviour, and further, that they the hoaxers, like the Delphic Oracle of old, have unique divination powers and are passing on their knowledge, to which they alone are privy, to lucky old you.
Whereas all they are in fact passing on is misinformation based on their ignorance.
Mars, even at its nearest in 2003, was 140 times as far away as the Moon, and it is only twice its size (Equatorial radius of Mars = 3,402.5 km. Equatorial radius of the Moon = 1,738.14 km.).
So how could an object that is twice the size of the Moon but at least 140 times as far away (more like 220 times as far away in December 2007 when it will be 55 million miles away) ever look as big as the Moon? Does a tomato 140 yards away look as big as a cherry held at arm's length?
The only way Mars could ever appear as large as the Moon is if it were to get as close as a million miles away,
If it did do that, it would be a disaster, causing huge tidal waves on Earth and tsunamai such as we have not seen the like of before. It would not be a thing to gawp at, and say "Oh wow! Awesome!" and tell all your friends to look out for it at 12.30 am !
But of course it won't do that (come within a million miles of Earth) as Mars has a stable orbit.
The hoaxers have sent out the same e-mail every summer as regards 27 August 2004, 27 August 2005, 27 August 2006 and now 27 August 2007. Again revealing their ignorance of how the Solar System works. Mars has a year that equals 1.88 Earth years and as a result only comes close to us once every 26 months: on 27th August 2003, and then not again until 30th October 2005 and then not again until 18th December 2007.
The idea of it having a close approach on the same date every year is nonsense therefore, it is not like a wedding anniversary or a birthday or Mothers' Day, As the hoaxers seem to believe,
If anyone had have craned their necks and looked at the skies at 12.30 am on 27 August 2004 or 27th August 2006, all they would have got for their efforts was a stiff neck. As Mars was on the far side of the Sun on those two occasions and nowhere to be seen, as it was hidden behind the Sun's glare.
That is how much the hoaxers know about astronomy. That is how accurate and worthless their predictions are. Nobody should be taken in by their "knowledge" and nobody should copy and spread their e-mail to others so as "to pass on the exciting news" they have just received.
Snopes.com (see link) have a useful article on the hoax.
2007-07-25 13:08:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, that is not true. It is a mixed up version of another untrue story, that said Mars would come so close to Earth that it would look as big as the Moon. That never happens, but people have been saying that it will ever since Mars came unusually close on August 27, 2003. But even then, Mars just looked like a bright star. It never gets close enough to appear as big as the Moon.
2007-07-25 17:01:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. Earth never has two moons. The most likely source of this misinformation would be if there are two FULL moons in August, one early in the month and another 28 days later and that is not even true for August although it is true for July 2007
http://stardate.org/nightsky/moon/index.php?month=7&year=2007&css=moon.css&Submit=Go
Even worse - a Google of 'two moons in August' reveals that it was a hoax posting from 2006 when a claim was made that Mars would be so close as to be as big as our moon and near it in the sky. It is never that big!!!
2007-07-25 16:58:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mike1942f 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I remember that misleading report others have mentioned about Mars looking as big as the full moon. The article was a great piece of deception, reporting that, with a 75X telescope, Mars would look as big as a full moon. Well, yeah, if you do the math you will find out that, when Mars is optimal for viewing, if a telescope can make Mars appear 75 times closer, then it will indeed appear as large as the full moon looks to the naked eye. So, the article wasn't technically incorrect, just highly deceptive in how it used a huge font for the phrase "MARS WILL LOOK AS LARGE AS THE FULL MOON!!" and a small font everywhere else. :)
2007-07-25 17:59:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is it true that you just asked a question validating your belief that two Moons will exist on August 27 at 12:30 AM, thereby demonstrating your abject gullibility? Shame on you for believing this.
2007-07-25 18:06:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What, you think one is just going to magically appear? Then at 12:31 am, it'll disappear again???
2007-07-25 16:58:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋