Should i accept either of these trades?

Question

Jason Witten, Eddie Kennsion for
Brandon Jacobs, Jason Elam{nate kaeding is my other k,i have LT}

TRADE 2: Jaoson Witten, Eddie Kennison
FOR
Maurice Jones Drew,Todd Heap

Crap theyll give me jason witten an kennison for todd heap and my other person

sma e with #!1

these 2 trades are with hello! saint pride ok

Answer 1

I'm giving Brady, Harrison and Bal D for LT and Jones Drew

Answer 2

All you guys are retarded. They want her to give them Heap and a very good RB for a worse TE and a worthless receiver. Dont accept any of the trades. If you have LT, Maurice Jones Drew, Brandon Jacobs, and Todd Heap, then you have a monster lineup. How many people are in your league? Three? You are sitting pretty at RB and TE. Also, Witten is hardly an upgrade over Heap. They may be equal but Heap has been better lately. Kennison is pretty much worthless. He is waiver wire material. Someone is trying to rip you off. You might need a WR, but I cant tell since you didnt tell me who you have.

Bottom line, reject all those moronic trades!

Answer 3

Both are bad trades for you. Even as a time-share back, Jacobs could outscore Witten and Kennison combined (Kennison has never been a reliable fantasy scorer, and that won't change this year). In the second offer, the TEs cancel each other out and Jones-Drew will definately be more productive than Kennison. If you have LT, Jacobs and Jones-Drew on your roster, you are in damn good shape.

Answer 4

Trade #2 looks pretty good for fantasy football. Heap and witten give you the same production, but (depending on the points system in your league) Jones-Drew should score a lot more points than Kennison.

Oh, if they're going to give you Witten and Kennison for those two tell 'em to take a long walk off a short pier. That's not a good deal for you at all.

Answer 5

ohhhh okay, so YOU have MJD and Heap. Definitely do not under any circumstances take trade two. Heap is better than Witten and Jones-Drew will have a much more productive season than old Eddie Kennison.

I probably would not take trade one either. You have a top 5 tight end with Heap, so you really don't need Witten because he probably wouldn't be an upgrade. Kennison is old, and thats it. He is not very good, especially with a rookie at qb.

Answer 6

I would definitely take trade # 2. You are getting an upgrade at TE, going from Witten to Heap. You are also getting a huge improvement trading Kennison for MJD. Even if you are pretty loaded at RB and don't need Maurice, you can probably trade him off to someone else and get a better WR than Kennison in return.

Answer 7

Trade 2: If you have Jones Drew and Heap on your team keep them.

Trade 1: I would keep Jacobs, because Tiki retired and he may have a very big year. I wouldn't even trade a replaceable kicker for Kennison.

Witten number wise does not match up to Heap and Kennison will struggle in KC especially if Larry Johnson leaves.

Answer 8

I would do trade 2 because the Chiefs have no QB and Kennison is old. Jones-Drew plays in a division where it's easy to run and Heap is an elite TE.

Answer 9

That's tough, it depends how your league scores.

Trade 1 definitely NOT, kickers are garbage and have next to no value when compared to a RB & WR

Trade 2 not sure, Witten is a premier TE but Kinnison has seen better days. Although Drew showed last year he will be a nice fantasy value and Heap remains a top 5 TE.

I hope that helped!! Good Luck!

Answer 10

If you take trade 1 ,I think you are getting the lower end of the trade because what you need to have are WR and RB and QB . Trade 2 is a good trade and your better option because good TE's sometimes are hard to come by and picked up Todd Heap for what you are asking will benefit you quite nicely. Good Luck!