If you don't know by now, get a copy of Marx's communist manifesto, that's a good start, add to it The death of a nation, and you are on a roll.
2007-07-25 08:17:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
i think of she ought to win and that i think of she might do a solid job. She's average (virtually to the factor of being calculatingly so, that's my greatest issue along with her), yet i think of she does characterize a honest bypass-area of the country and has a wealth of journey. the drawback of a Hillary Clinton presidency, although, is that we would see a minimum of yet another 4 years of the comparable 50-50 government that has haunted this us of a over the final decade and a one million/2, with conservatives and liberals at one yet another's throats (fed by skill of the media on the two facets) extremely than fixing the topic concerns dealing with the country. She does deserve a considerate attention of her candidacy, yet who she "seems to be (and who her husband is)" will probable trump what she truly "is." there is an exceptionally large article interior the July 2, 2007, difficulty of The us of a that probes why lots of ladies individuals on the left (and a few of those are on the far left) have issues of Hillary.
2016-11-10 07:23:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We won't know what she really stands for unless she gets elected, and only after she takes office.
Guaranteed I'll vote for a Republican if Hillary is the Democrat nominee. I'm a ABC person. Anyone But Clinton. I'm an Arkansas resident and proud to say I've never voted for a Cllinton. And I am not about to start now.
2007-07-25 08:12:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by namsaev 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
We know already . Selling us out and ******* us over!
Creating a global government!
She can't win a real election cause even the average American isn't stupid enough to vote for her.
But I fear that pesidential elections have been rigged for at least 15 years and some group of people already know who will win
2007-07-25 08:14:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Q 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes. She has 15 months to tell you, if you'll listen. Obviously, you haven't so far because she does not "stand for" higher taxes but would roll back some of the Bush wartime tax cuts. Any president is going to have to do that. The difference is that a Democrat will make the wealthy pay more of their fair share, while a Republican will surcharge the middle and working class.
With 50 million people without health insurance, we have a crisis. The American people can't afford another President who neglects this issue. Our prosperity ultimately depends on a healthy work force, and the US is lagging in this area.
2007-07-25 08:10:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
6⤋
Hell John K I'd like to know what any of them stand for. Right now it's just lip service. I'm hoping the closer we get to elections they will get serious.
2007-07-25 08:09:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by gone 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Any level headed person already knows what she stands for.
She is a socialist thru and thru. God forbid this Hildabeast ever gets elected. If she does it will be the darkest day this country has ever seen.
2007-07-25 08:11:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by wyltk1 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Trying to figure out what Hillary stands for is like trying to herd cats.
2007-07-25 08:11:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
She stands for the new world order. She hired La Raza to her campaign so she want's open borders. She supports war and is getting paid from neo-cons behind the scenes. She'll continue the same course we've been on. Nothing will change!
2007-07-25 08:11:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by jeb black 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
The one policy of hers that has been consistent for at least as long as she has been a Senator is her staunch support for the permanent imprisonment of all ugly primates that wear spectacles and sport a soul patch.
For that reason alone, I say, "Hillary in '08!!!"
2007-07-25 08:15:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋