And, do all possible to keep terrorists off of US soil?
2007-07-25 07:14:54 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh Jim, don't be so silly!
2007-07-25 07:24:38 · update #1
Heck no! A bunch of splineless cowards pandering to special interest groups.
2007-07-25 07:16:10 · answer #1 · answered by Eyota Zen 3 · 6⤊ 6⤋
At this point, saying they would would turn the masses against them - based upon their own previous propaganda - so, even if they have that goal in mind, they'd be stupid to say it.
Just can't trust those libs to be forthright on the subject at this point in time....
As far as keeping them off US soil, there again, it is hard to justify building up border security while simultaneously, denying the enormity of the problem.
The lot of them have placed not only themselves, but us along with them, in a very perilous Catch 22.
Guess we'll have to vote Republican to get an honest, forthright president in '09.
EDIT: Funny how the libs posted that all their candidates would. What are they basing this upon? Certainly, the dem candidates have skirted the issue unless, you call 'bringing our troops home' fighting the war on terrorism.
It is all lip service, anyway. They could not and would not 'bring our troops home' and they know it. They are simply pandering to their audience when saying otherwise and they well know it.
2007-07-25 14:26:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, it's pretty obvious the Republicans have been trying to do this since 9/11. However, the term "war on terrorism" is so euphemistic that it cannot really be defined. It would have been better to just declare war on Al Qaeda and any country who supports them.
It's mighty funny that when we entered Iraq, 99 per cent of Americans backed Bush. Now, the media has put a whole new spin on things and Bush is "hated". Believe me, once the Democrats get in, you will soon see attacks on American soil with many casualties.
2007-07-25 14:21:07 · answer #3 · answered by TexasDolly 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No. They all voted for open borders and amnesty for illegals. The only thing they care about is getting backing from the businesses who are hiring illegals. One hand washes (or dirties) the other don't you know.
If you view this link, you will see which candidates support amnesty for illegals and which ones support the law.
http://www.yournextpresident.net/thefacts.php
Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo are currently cosponsoring the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2007
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR01940:@@@L&summ2=m&
By allowing illegals to remain in the US and not enforcing our laws, they are allowing terrorists to live on our soil. Wake up! Terrorists are entering along with Mexicans from our southern border. Some have been caught.
2007-07-25 18:44:18 · answer #4 · answered by Naturescent 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush isn't doing /all/ that's possible to keep terrorists off US soil, and I doubt any other candidate from either party would, either.
I'd expect Hillary or Edwards to continue to fight the war on terror, just not as vigorously. Obama is probably the only candidate with a hope of winning who might actually give up on it entirely.
2007-07-25 14:19:39 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The war on terrorism. What is that, exactly? Pick a random group and blame them for all terrorist acts against the U.S.? Bomb the hell out of some random country that never attacked us in the first place? Keep our own borders wide open, allowing pretty much anyone to enter this country, while doing our best to completely destroy a sovereign nation that never did anything to us?
No. No Democrat will do that.
2007-07-25 14:20:07 · answer #6 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
It's too bad so many of you are brain washed into thinking that the civil war in Iraq has anything to do with the real terrorist threat in the world.
Yes the Dem.'s will fight the terrorist the "real" terrorist, Clinton would of done a lot more against them if you idiots weren't so interested in his johnson.
Every time he wanted to talk about terrorist or mid-east problems y'all hushed it with Monica.
You're pathetic cowardly hypocrites.
I still love how so many of ya are all for this war as long as you're sitting on your sofa with a remote in your hand while someone else and their families are sacrificing their lives
2007-07-25 14:32:13 · answer #7 · answered by Steve G 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I haven't seen one candidate from either side saying they don't want to break al quada up. they all have different means of doing so, but I know all the democratic candidates want to follow the constitution and other laws while protecting us
2007-07-25 20:29:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
all of them will. They will keep going after Bin Ladin, they will follow the suggestions of the 911 commission and they will do their best to improve homeland security. They just won't keep stirring up the quagmire in Iraq. Now don't think they will abandon it..... the Liberal in us Dem's wouldn't allow us to completely abandon the Iraqi people... we are just tired of our soldiers dieing trying to change something that can't be changed.... these people want to fight a civil war and only they can decide to stop that.. our troops shouldn't be in the middle.
2007-07-25 14:24:26 · answer #9 · answered by pip 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Depends. Hillary votes for it, then Campaigns against it. Then says we need to stay the course and leave 50,000 troops there, so who knows. First she did her own research, then admitted not reading any research.....
Obama...I think he will invite them over for a "Senate Sleepover".
Edwards..He will have his wife talk mean to them. If that doesn't work, he will invite them over for a "Hair and Nails Party".....
2007-07-25 14:20:51 · answer #10 · answered by Ken C 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think any candidate, Republican or Democrat, will fight the criminality of terrorism... wars are between nations not crime syndicates.
2007-07-25 14:19:45 · answer #11 · answered by cattledog 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋