or does it seem strange that just days after Bush vetoed bills for the withdrawal of our troops from Iraq... we are having another security lock down on airports?
seems a little too convenient, what do you think?
2007-07-25 06:59:36 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
well, as i've mentioned in other posts, if the US was *really* interested in stopping middle east terrorism, they would take all the money they are investing in military and construction contracts, and invest in an alternative fuel source/stop pandering to the saudis. and like i've said, neither happens, which tells a lot to people that can see things for how they really are.
2007-07-25 07:10:49 · answer #1 · answered by spillmind 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Trying to find a viable target to scare the sheeple again.
I've noticed the patrols at the PATH stations in NYC stopped overnight, and Indian Point nuclear power plant in Buchanan, NY, just 35 miles away from Manhattan, is so conveniently unguarded and vulnerable.
2007-07-25 07:17:40 · answer #2 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There have been numerous times over the past seven-plus years when the "fear level" has seemingly gotten cranked up. Too bad there wasn't that type of diligence by the political leaders on September 10, 2001.
2007-07-25 07:24:58 · answer #3 · answered by Zombie Birdhouse 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well,it definitely looks far more than a coincidence I believe they have had cells here ever since 9/11 but have been in a laying low mode and are waiting for the call. I hope we will be better prepared and stop them.
2007-07-25 08:10:17 · answer #4 · answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
that is the true link Iraq has to the U.S. wait instead of saying Saddam was linked to Al-Qaeda the true link could be established between the U.S. and Al-Qaeda or that Saddam was linked to the U.S. still fear eats people is easy to succumb. everything is to coneveniant could be in everyone's heads this could be wondered at. like the saying has it keep the people in fear and distracted .this makes them easy to control. to mangle a phrase ''never fear i will not protect you'' strange though the public reaction is somewhat like this''oh save me'' then the hero says ''never fear i will protect you'' the public is like the fainting women in those old adventure books and follow the script without realising it. the men as well ''save me '' they say in their bass voices. then the women in higher voices say ''save me'' just same thing oh save each time is the picture
2007-07-25 11:48:50 · answer #5 · answered by darren m 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Cheney told his front man Bush to up the perceived threat level so they could have a temporary press release hiatus this coming week-end. [apparently the waves are looking good up at the Bush compound on Cape Cod] This is also following that all important gut feeling of H.S. head, Michael Chertoff.
2007-07-25 07:23:42 · answer #6 · answered by gldnsilnc 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Everything the Bush admin does seems a little too convenient.
Are the terrorists working with him?
Everytime you turn around, when Bush has a conflict with congress, a terrorist threat comes up in the most convenient of ways for Bush.
2007-07-25 07:03:21 · answer #7 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 7⤊ 3⤋
If it were a conspiracy, wouldn't the lock down have occurred before the veto?
Just askin'.
2007-07-25 08:11:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm mm... couldn't be more chatter... or 300 new graduates from the al Qaeda school of kill the infidels and start in the US... Bush has not wavered from his "no withdrawal date" stance at all ... so... must be you!!
2007-07-25 07:09:25 · answer #9 · answered by bereal1 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The terrorists are coming! B-b-but the borders are open? We could be attacked any day now! B-b-but why are our borders open man? Nevermind the borders man! Al Qaeda cells are in america!
2007-07-25 07:06:03 · answer #10 · answered by jeb black 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋