If he didn't have a license to practice law, then he couldn't be Attorney General, right?
And after watching his dismal performance in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee (again) yesterday, it is apparent that he is lying or unfit to hold the job due to serious illness (eg: Alzheimers disease).
Either way, it sounds like grounds for disbarrment from the Texas Bar Association.
Comments?
2007-07-25 06:20:40 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Charity: I'm not a Democrat nor a liberal progressive. But Gonzales is completely unfit for the job. His nomination should have never been allowed to go through and should have been stopped short like Harriet Miers.
2007-07-25 06:26:42 · update #1
DavidMi: How do you resolve the fact that Gonzales could not answer 1 single question posed by Senator Arlen Spector yesterday? Spector started tossing him softballs too and Gonzales could not answer the questions with a simple yes or no.
2007-07-25 06:28:47 · update #2
Unlike a lot of state governments which have laws requiring anyone who runs for Attorney General to be a member of the bar, there is no such requirement for US Attorney General. Congress can remove him from office through the impeachment process, and he will probably be a lot easier to remove from office than President Bush.
2007-07-25 06:26:46 · answer #1 · answered by Robert V 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
it relatively is the architect of the criminal language that de-humanizes all of us who opposes the want of the U. S. and subverts the very recommendations upon which the very criminal means of this government became into based. Due technique heavily isn't an analogous. He ought to flow.
2016-10-09 08:55:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree, he is not fit for the job. If he knew he could not handle it, why did he continue? One simple reason: he wants to put the blame on anyone and everything else so he doesn't look like someone who was doing nothing.
Try looking up Omar Guerrero, that will make you wanna barf, too. Texas has some screw ups on their hands. . .
2007-07-25 06:29:43 · answer #3 · answered by Chick-a-Dee 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
your not to o bright
there is much more important things to be focusing on than him
it is a red herring and you know it
but keep up the discourse thats a great way to really help america
maybe you should consider moving to the soviet union and that way your govt will tell you exactly what to think
2007-07-25 06:30:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nothing is going to happen to him, does anyone in their right mind think bush is going to let anything negative happen to his pet monkey
2007-07-25 07:51:48 · answer #5 · answered by firewomen 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that guy is a f-ing clown and a disgrace to this country - it is obvious he has as many qualifications for that post as a possum's fecal deposit = none
bring back the guillotine for that clown
2007-07-25 06:32:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
As a long term Democrat, I'm not sure if my party can be counted on to act strategically . . . this would just be too simple.
2007-07-25 06:24:18 · answer #7 · answered by CHARITY G 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He is a truth teller despite all eight senators who now say he lied about them discussing the Domestic Spying Program!
2007-07-25 06:28:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
So in your mind he is guilty before found innocent? Man, I just love the court of public opinion. No pesky evidence is required.
2007-07-25 06:26:02 · answer #9 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋