No they are not "delusional" they are people that agree with Bush.
I am not a Bush fan but I am also certainly not a fan of the Democrats at all either (and will not be voting for either Bush nor the Democrats in the future).
2007-07-25 06:20:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Calvin 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
I would not say ALL of them are delusional. Some of them are.
Some of them are Lemmings who follow others whether it is detrimental to them.
Others do so in the name of religion. In so doing they do not realize that they have must the most immoral administration in power and continues to support them as they break laws, destroy the Constitution and our Bill of Rights and make us the most hated country in the world. They sit idly by while the Administration justifies torture and inhumane treatment. Perhaps they need to read their bible and the teachings of Jesus again!
But the worst are the ones who allow all this to happen for monetary gain, the love of money. This is mostly the ones who continue to get all the tax breaks and no-bid contracts and political appointment jobs!
Congress should Pass a Law which prohibits any Politician, Judge, President, Congressman or any other Civil Servant from getting ANY benefit that EVERY US citizen does not get. This would include the same medical coverage, retirement benefits, or any other benefit.
They should not be able to raise their pay without a vote from the citizens. If the raise is for inflation, then they must proportionately raise the minimum wage at the same time!
Where in the World is Usama Bin Laden?
2007-07-25 06:33:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by B. D Mac 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Are you aware that people can have different opinions than you? Just because someones opinion is different than yours, it does not mean it is wrong.
I do not like Bush, but realize that people aren't delusional because they have a different opinion than me.
T-22<>- There were not Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3718150.stm
We have proof that this unnamed FBI friend is real how? If you do have an FBI friend, and they did tell you that, then they should be brought up on charges is declassifying classified material.
Dead Marxist- You are right that he didn't go to war illegally, but he did go to war on false pretenses. The article you provided states that "Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said the results were from a field test, which can be imperfect, and said more analysis was needed." Plus "Tests conducted by the Iraqi Survey Group...and others concluded the mustard gas was 'stored improperly,' which made the gas 'ineffective.'"
2007-07-25 06:21:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by greencoke 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
to bushonlysubmale: "Iraq attacked America on 9/11!"?? Are you kidding? Even the president says that isn't true, though he continues to suggest that it is.
to T-22: 1) No, we did not find WMD's, in any quantity.
2) The FBI is a domestic agency, it doesn't go to Syria to spy on Iraqi trucks. Next time you tell this lie, pretend your "friend" is in the CIA. And come up with a reason he told you but didn't tell the CIA - seems they'd want to know about that.
2007-07-25 06:30:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by DW 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
"He went to war on false pretenses"
This is incorrect. We went to war on Congressional authority. The vote to authorize force in Iraq was approved by many Democrats.
"this war that did not provide anything meaningful for us"
Also incorrect. There have been no new attacks on US soil, and there have been truckloads of terrorists slain. A dangerous despot has been removed. Our military is now battle-hardened and experienced.
"have not found any weapons of mass destruction"
Again incorrect. Mustard gas and sarin were discovered, albeit in small quantities
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html
Just in case you have a problem with a fox news link, same story here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1120720,00.html
2007-07-25 06:24:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
there are always idiots who will play devils advocate just to get a thrill. I suspect that is what is going on with the bush supporters cause logic has evaded the bush admin for 8 years.
2007-07-25 06:17:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by bbbbriggs04 3
·
5⤊
2⤋
Haliburton is very happy we spent those trillions of dollars.
Daddy is happy that little georgie, took care of badman Saddam. bin laden is happier than anyone. I don't know whats wrong with these idiots that support a moron!
2007-07-25 06:23:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
well, many of the 25 Percenters are Evangelical Christians who believe that GW has his ear to God's lips. these folks believe that the sun and moon can be halted in the sky and that a woman can be turned into a salt lick so it's not hard to understand why they remain steadfast in their loyalty to their Cowboy of God. to lose faith in GW would be to lose faith in the Holy Spirit who guided them to vote for GW.
PS. greencoke? not long ago anyone who didn't get into jackbooted lockstep with the neoCON propaganda was called an "unAmerican traitor" and a "terrorist enabler" so cry me a river.
2007-07-25 06:21:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by nebtet 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
I can't see why you are differentiating between currant Bush supporters and anyone who has supported him at any time. Was the man ever a moral creature?
2007-07-25 06:19:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vizzi-torr 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
The ones who write on Y!A are definitely delusional, but his "handlers" are not. They have had him set things up so that at the slightest "provocation" (a storm, a small riot, a "terrorist attack" {even one that they stage}), Bush will become the Dictator-in-Chief!. This has been well-thought-out, and I think that if/when it happens we will all be surprised by the non-shucking and jiving George W. who emerges. He will be a very mean, very vindictive, very murderous man!!!
BEWARE! It's coming.....
2007-07-25 06:22:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Joey's Back 6
·
3⤊
4⤋