http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8681225708920427234&q=mena+arkansas&total=56&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADd3TIPAbGY http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6470450895164255089&q=mena+arkansas&total=56&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=8 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7349140906801270904&q=mena+arkansas&total=56&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=6
2007-07-25
05:39:19
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
your so right mr robot. soon they will be so uncomfortable they will wish they had paid attantion.
2007-07-25
13:40:28 ·
update #1
like it did for bill? who you foolin, better speak up now!
2007-07-25
13:41:37 ·
update #2
lisa c, will you!!!! you must spread the word its you duty to alert the public. google north american union in video, then new world order ,.....people need to pay attention. here ill do it for ya http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vda1KRF75M http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hiPrsc9g98 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHMnUZ9kdGs
2007-07-25
13:49:02 ·
update #3
LISA C, ON ANOTHER NOTE, CONSIDER THIS IF YOU DONT, THIS IS YOUR FUTURE, EXAMINE EVERY LINK IN THIS SITE , KNOW ABOUT FIMA BUILDING CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN YOUR STATE? 600 ALREADY, EMPTY, READY FOR YOU
2007-07-26
12:37:48 ·
update #4
OOPS, CLICKED TO SOON LISA C, HERES YOUR LINK http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/fema.htm
2007-07-26
12:38:57 ·
update #5
me too below, well if that isnt the most uneducated , uninformed bunch of garbage ive ever heard. ken star?? seriuosly?? get real. who would you hold responsable then for what went on on mena arkensas while clinton was govenor? would you like to just say it didnt happen? any one in any doubt, google mena arkensas and get the truth about thouse drug dealing, lieing scum bags.
2007-07-29
17:58:26 ·
update #6
me too, i just cant get over the ignorance of your response. so i have to further knock it down. what is it with some people that they will defend these drug dealing scum bags to the death? criminals controling their own investigations. what is wrong you? papa bush was calling the shots, pulling the strings, blocking investigations just like his son did with the 9/11 ommission report. a total sham, a lie. 70 million spent on an investigation means that the criminals robbed us again, thats all. it does not imply any form of justice was served. if it was not a fraudulent investigation, then who did it conclude was responsable for hundreds of tons of cocaine being smuggled into the country? WAKE UP? lets say your right , they had nothing to do with any of it. what does it say about the fact that they allowed hundreds of tons of narcotics to be smuggled into a state that they governed and didnt expose? courthouses were giving away basketball sentences for this stuff
2007-07-29
18:17:51 ·
update #7
me too continued, your heros did nothing? refused to alert the public? they poison our nation and you defend them? you better go watch hannity nation on fox, let him scare you with fake terror threats so you can give up your freedom and your liberty. 9/11 was a inside job. the terrorist are our government. soon you can get your rfid chip implant or go to one of these consentration camps for refusing. you are a domestic terrorist, dumbing it down to the public. i know how you work.
2007-07-29
18:31:43 ·
update #8
Very Interesting!!! We should consider it, but the question is.... Will we?
2007-07-25 10:23:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In America we are innocent until proven guilty. If not we all could be jailed based on unfounded statements. Hillary was never found guilty of drug charges and the other things that seem to continually surface about her past. Everyone can change and when we learn we do change. If she had problems in her earlier life surely she has learned to handle them by now. Before making decisions on rumor look at her record. She was a success before the White House (even though she spent a lot of time in court proving it), as First Lady she wined and dinned with numerous world leaders (didn’t accomplish anything and there wee no lasting results), and as a Senator she voted to rid Iraq and the world of a terrible dictator (by her admission she did not read the intelligence reports but she did have her aids brief her on Iraq before the vote; that shows an ability to delegate and use of staff). If you are going to judge her on the past be sure to use FACT not hearsay. We need a president who believes in "Do as I say, not as I do."
2007-07-30 07:18:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dallen B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is stupidity. The Starr Commission investigated Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton for twenty years back, and came up with NO criminal activity on their part. This is why they settled for a tawdry affair and played it up as though it were the scandal of the century.
We spent more than 70 million dollars of our tax money on that investigation, with top Republican lawyers digging into the Clinton activities, every year of their lives, every person they encountered. Now you are asking everyone to believe the Clintons were involved in a drug-smuggling operation? Get real!
Ask Ken Starr about it. Is he THAT lousy as an investigator that he missed something like this and had to settle for Monica and her flashing panties and her blue dress?
2007-07-29 14:24:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Me, Too 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
i wanna be a dictato…: With a name like yours, I would be careful what I asked and insinuated dictator wannabe.
Read Me, Too's answer.
If you have new evidence, take it to the authorities and have the case re-opened.
Stop depending on hearsay, rumours and insinuations. Do your own unbiassed, open minded research. Please do not call this liberalism as many who are unwilling to and/or incapable of making an honest effort to dig up the actual facts for themselves.
All those links you included are based on hearsay, rumours and insinuations.
Good Luck
2007-07-30 05:25:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Comp-Elect 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of you have been doing too many of the cocaine you communicate of. Writing in those caps supplies it away. it relatively is such as you're writing on coke, in basic terms like people who consistently communicate on coke. all the Presidential applicants are attentive to cocaine smuggling into united statesa.. Do you think of they are all dumb? you don't get to be a Presidential candidate by using being stupid and unaware.
2016-12-14 17:48:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by keeven 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All of this sort of thing will come out when she gets the nomination. People will be horrifed at this opportunistic poser once these things come to light.
2007-07-25 07:02:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shhhh, people hate hearing the truth...it makes them uncomfortable.
2007-07-25 06:59:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr.Robot 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, as long as it's added to the list of all her other criminal activity.
2007-07-29 03:48:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by LindaAnn 4
·
0⤊
0⤋