Don't ask where their fighting. They are in an anti-gravity arena so both animals are able to move freely about.
2007-07-25 03:24:01 · 12 answers · asked by kaan_artis 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Zoology
A bear is a lot faster than a shark, so I'd put my money on the bear. Even dolphins routinely challenge sharks and win, they have the advantage of speed. Sharks have huge, scary teeth, but they're pretty slow and dumb.
Addendum: Put a bear in shallow water with a shark, and the bear would STILL win. The only way a shark can win is by a sudden attack from deep water.
Addendum 2: Sharks are NOT "agile swimmers". Dolphins, otters, seals, and some other warm blooded sea animals are by far more agile swimmers than sharks. Sharks have to almost wholly depend on surprise.
2007-07-25 03:30:35 · answer #1 · answered by Scythian1950 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is no arena where a bear and a shark can exist simultaneously -- one breathes air, the other has to keep moving in water, so I guess the shark is in a tank and the bear is in there wrestling with it and coming up for air every so often???? That whole anti-gravity thing is just confusing. If the water doesn't stay in the tank, how can the shark swim?
A second issue: there are huge numbers of types of bears and sharks -- a grizzly bear or a polar bear could beat most sharks -- they are expert at fishing. A great white shark would easily kill a sun bear, which is small and harmless.
2007-07-25 04:27:33 · answer #2 · answered by Sandy G 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The bear would probably win in such place since its got a powerful body and one blow from its hand is enough to kill or make the shark unconcious. But if the bear and the shark were fighting on earth, then I don't think any one of them would win since the shark doen't usually come near to the shore and the bear will not go near the sea or the ocean.
2007-07-25 03:32:49 · answer #3 · answered by Monkey 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If the water have been deep adequate for the shark to pass desirable, the undergo may be at a drawback shifting in the process the water. of direction, the shark would not assault the undergo except it have been ravenous to dying or the undergo have been bleeding. Assuming a style of is actual, the shark might take out the undergo's legs and consume it. on the different hand, if the water have been shallow adequate that the undergo ought to truly pass around totally, the shark may be in abnormally shallow water, and can then be at a drawback. The undergo, who's gifted at swiping at underwater creatures, ought to truly claw the shark, wounding it, and then tear it aside and consume it like lots salmon.
2016-11-10 06:58:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most likely bear, though under natural circumstances the shark would win as the only logical fight for this to take place is in the water. Bears are good swimmers, but I doubt they'd be as agile as a shark underwater.
2007-07-26 00:45:47 · answer #5 · answered by FN 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bear- he has the advantage because he has claws and teeth. Unless the shark bit him and drug him into the water, then he would drown and the shark would win.
2007-07-25 03:33:14 · answer #6 · answered by Hannahs Mum-one on the way 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It depends if you held the fight in water or air.
anti-gravity (if it existed) couldn't make a bear grow gills, or a fish grow lungs
2007-07-25 03:37:16 · answer #7 · answered by SeabourneFerriesLtd 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
sharks they have more agilty and teethbut the bear would win cause it has more than one thing it could attackwith while sharks have only teeth
2007-07-25 06:34:56 · answer #8 · answered by tanner 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
that antigravity is in the water or out, that will tell who will win
2007-07-26 12:44:54 · answer #9 · answered by yos 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Me. After they are through chewing each other up, I could have a cook-out!
2007-07-25 03:33:32 · answer #10 · answered by surffsav 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋