I do. For the last book to not be the longest just seems wrong. Still, can't complain about the pace of it.
2007-07-25 01:22:25 · 6 answers · asked by fakesham43 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
it was too short compared to the 5th and 6th...
2007-07-25 01:38:00 · answer #1 · answered by majj 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that by ending the book the way she did, she left herself an opening to write more. Not about Harry but possibly about the children and Harry's Godson. Let's all hope shall we? That way we would know more about what happened to everyone else in the story. Or maybe she just left us to draw our own conclusions........
2007-07-25 08:37:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I thought it was just right--but I'd kind of like to know what happened to some of the other characters who survived, like George--did his twin's death cause him to go out of the joke and novelty business? Did Luna go into publishing? Is McGonagle the Headmistress of Hogwarts?
2007-07-25 08:26:39 · answer #3 · answered by Chrispy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i just don't think it was set proportionately because it seemed that the middle dragged on while the end was very short..or rushed in a way.
2007-07-25 08:33:05 · answer #4 · answered by Cass 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah it is...
rowling just skip the story after the battle end to the story of their life after 19 years later...she should told more about it
2007-07-25 08:29:24 · answer #5 · answered by pitcher723 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wasn't too short
It wasn't too long
It was juuuuust right
2007-07-25 08:26:28 · answer #6 · answered by Uncle John 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋