English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-07-24 20:42:30 · 9 answers · asked by Kitty Powers 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

under Roman Law Pontius Pilate would have authority to make the Appeal to Caesar...under the circumstances...

2007-07-24 21:06:10 · update #1

would not have even been required to speak, even under "our" law of counsel, Authority to Appeal to Caesar was preserved under Pilate, considering wrongful execution under Roman Law...

2007-07-25 01:55:04 · update #2

9 answers

A fictional answer to a fictional story would be yes. However, for those of us who have hard time believing religion over science, this would not even apply...

2007-07-30 13:48:14 · answer #1 · answered by Billy Jack 2 · 2 0

The right of appeal was exclusively reserved to citizens. Read Titus Livius, especially the history of the Decemvirs, who had abolished the right of appeal during the Decemvirate, but invoked the right of appeal when they were tried.

If memory serves me, the appeal did not stop them from being dragged to the Tiber on a hook.

Makes me wish we had a Tarpeian Rock in DC to toss Bush, Cheney, Condi, Ashcroft, Rumsfeld and Powell off of.

2007-07-31 09:14:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Caesar was in the kitchen making salads and couldn't be bothered.

2007-08-02 01:34:02 · answer #3 · answered by jumpingrightin 6 · 0 0

...Pilot was the Governing authority at the time... and he sent Jesus to Herod... Herod was the person to take the case to Caesar (if he wanted to)... Herod sent Jesus back to Pilot...
(case closed...Scripture/Prophecy fulfilled)......

2007-08-01 05:33:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Were not the circumstances unusual?
Some kind of HOLIDAY.
The choice was given to the people?

2007-07-25 04:15:22 · answer #5 · answered by zes2_zdk 3 · 0 0

if the story happened just who would make the appeal?

2007-07-25 04:02:59 · answer #6 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0 0

(assuming that Jesus was the savior):
No, because then he wouldn't have died for our sins.

(assuming otherwise):
No, because the temple leaders he criticized wanted to take him down.

2007-07-25 03:53:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

each man must seek his own salvation!

2007-07-31 21:55:56 · answer #8 · answered by book writer 6 · 0 0

no

2007-08-02 03:39:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers