I think anything that the mudbags do, from here on out, is our fault, if we don't turn the middle east into a glass tabletop.
2007-07-24 19:28:33 · 10 answers · asked by R L 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The use of Nukes by Israel or any other country in the region will have devastating effects.
Depending on the kiloton yield, the outcry would be numbing. 500 kiloton strategic nukes would have global suicide implications, while tactical nukes will have regional implications.
Strategic nukes, at least a dozen of them in the 500 kiloton range would take out the middle east and vaporize around 190 million (3% of the world). Another 200 million in nearby countries would die from radioactive poisoning, and their only crime would be living next door to the Middle East.
Carl Sagan estimated a very low threshold for nuclear winter, a 100 kiloton blast would ignite fires that would cause a nuclear winter....ie, the sun would be blotted out due to the dust and ash from the fires and all plant life would cease to exist....followed shortly thereafter by animal life.
So the option of eliminating the middle east by nukes is global suicide....which is why nukes have been a deterrent to total war for the past 60 years....altho it is a very enticing option.
2007-07-26 14:37:08 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nukes are best used when not used at all. See the Cold War theory of mad. That said trust me I am soldier I know the ROE sucks. We dont need to use nukes right now we just need to be able to fight back without giving a damm about what Amnesty international or Human Rights watch says.
2007-07-24 20:49:33 · answer #2 · answered by satcomgrunt 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No remorse is what they have everyday against our soldiers so we shall have none either! Nuke and tell the Liberals to go F themselves and thank us later! THey are holding all of us back from peace!
2007-07-24 19:40:26 · answer #3 · answered by brenda r 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
nukes r like turnaquits. they seem like a good EZ idea at first but its a last resort and has major bad affects, like losing a lim or the country attacking back at us.
2007-07-24 19:35:35 · answer #4 · answered by CD 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
And you sound like you have the same qualities that you have attributed to people that you have labeled mudbags. You have made people into objects with your label, and your suggestion means that you have become (at least at the moment) what you most fear from them.
In other words, what you most fear are the negative qualities that you believe people in the middle east have. And you have become someone with the same negative qualities that you fear by suggesting that we bomb them.
2007-07-24 19:33:56 · answer #5 · answered by Habitus 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Ahhhh. The brilliance of some people is just overlooked by the masses.
What is wrong with you? Seriously?
2007-07-24 19:39:00 · answer #6 · answered by Toodeemo 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
And the ensuing nuclear winter would completely end global warming. Two birds one stone. Besides, fallout is a liberal conspiracy right?
2007-07-24 19:31:39 · answer #7 · answered by Memnoch 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
hadjiii keeps messing around with their so called jihad, and WE will turn their country into a humongous parking lot! no remorse!
2007-07-24 19:31:50 · answer #8 · answered by Ask me anything 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
why dont you just put your head in the microwave already
2007-07-24 21:21:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
couldnt have said it better than brenda did...
2007-07-24 19:58:10 · answer #10 · answered by surferchiq1313 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋