A. Life on Earth evolves through genetic gradation.
B. Jesus was the product of emaculate conception.
2007-07-24 13:01:00 · 21 answers · asked by Dog 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Lets see:
Biologists will tell you that the odds of evolution happening are quintillion's to one and biologists have worked with doctors to implant fertilized eggs in a virginal woman.
Scientific proof of the ability to make this happen on one side and a gamble where the odds are better that I will win the Power Ball ten times in a row before evolution occurs on the other.
Gee, hard choice since I have not even won the Power Ball once.
I go with the virgin birth.
2007-07-24 13:08:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
B. The story told as Mary's sounds like an experience told by some sexual abuse victims. That seems much more plausible than an emaculate conception. "Virgin" in the original writings simply meant that she didn't have a man to call her own...she was alone and unmarried.
If your faith is strong, knowing the truth behind the Christian Mythology won't shake it.
2007-07-24 20:22:22 · answer #2 · answered by ... 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
C. You didn't stack the deck, and that was a completely fair question
I have a lot more trouble believing C than either A or B, anyway.
Seriously, not all christians are babtists from 'Nawlins, and even then, not all babtists from 'Nawlins, Loosana are that dumb.
I know you're not forcing a choice between the two concepts, but this is how most people are going to look at your question when they glance at it:
A. I am a not a creationist
B. I am a creationist.
2007-07-24 20:13:59 · answer #3 · answered by Just Jess 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A.
As would you please explain why birds have lung sacks and how on earth could those evolve without have the whole total group called avians dieing out instantly
As W.E. Swinton is quoted " There is no fossil evidence of the stages through which the remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved." ***
As there is no other vertebrate that has a lung system that even closely resembles that of a bird.
2007-07-24 20:31:00 · answer #4 · answered by Kathy H 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
B. emaculate?
2007-07-24 20:08:11 · answer #5 · answered by Grendel's Father 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This seems to beg the real question: should we be guided by religious faith or by a form of logic that is currently persuasive? Cheers
2007-07-24 20:06:09 · answer #6 · answered by Ward 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
B. But Jesus is suppose to be outside the box.
2007-07-24 20:06:56 · answer #7 · answered by chico2149 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
B, cuz it didnt happen. The original Hebrew copies of the gospels do not say ANYTHING about a virgin birth. they only say that jesus was born of a young woman. the greek copies of these books we're mistranslated later on in history to say virgin insead of young, which is very confusable. Thats a fact.
2007-07-24 20:06:36 · answer #8 · answered by sprocket9727 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
A rock immaculately turning into a cell. You evolutionists don't seem to like going back to your origin of life.
2007-07-24 20:12:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Given the circunstances and what we know today, neither is hard to believe
Paz de Cristo
2007-07-24 20:07:26 · answer #10 · answered by Emiliano M. 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋