Should students hear equal time of alternative theories about physics?

Question

There is just as much "disagreement and uncertainty" about physics among physicists as there is about evolution among biologists. The bible has a lot of examples of physics that contradict our scientific understanding in ways similar to the creation/evolution disagreement. Why then do people argue for equal time for "magic man does it" in biology, but not physics?

btw, what would a semester-long course in intelligent design consist of?

(if this question has been asked a thousand times before, then I'm sorry - I didn't know)

Answer 1

LoL
Course syllabus:

The Firmament: Fixed in time and space,
Seven Days Strategy: Alternate Banging Theory
Magnetism: Or is it Magicnetism?
Electronic Circuits: Blindfold, copper plate and etching acid --no rubber gloves required
Einstein Revisited: E=M times (the velocity of an unladen European swallow)squared
and
ID: The under aged drinker's guide to birth certificate forgery

Answer 2

Theories supported by scientific evidence should be taught in science classes. Beliefs backed by nothing more than the bible belong in religious studies classes

Answer 3

They should hear about the theories of physics in physics class. If you want to learn the alternative, elect to study so.

Answer 4

They do, in physics class.

Intelligent Design is theology, not science. It should be taught in chruch, not school.

There is no scientific alternative to evolution.

Answer 5

Only if there was consistent evidance to back it up.

Answer 6

All satanic sciences including physics should be removed from schools and replaced with bible based sciences.

Answer 7

I can only assume this is a rhetorical question...