English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If not, please say why not, and what denom. are you?

2007-07-23 13:31:24 · 15 answers · asked by Jed 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I am already Christian.

2007-07-23 13:45:46 · update #1

15 answers

Yes, the Bible is trustworthy.

Is Our Copy of the Bible a Reliable Copy of the Original?
by Rich Deem

Old Testament - How do we know the Bible has been kept in tact for over 2,000 years of copying? Before the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, our earliest Hebrew copy of the Old Testament was the Masoretic text, dating around 800 A.D. The Dead Sea Scrolls date to the time of Jesus and were copied by the Qumran community, a Jewish sect living around the Dead Sea. We also have the Septuagint which is a Greek translation of the Old Testament dating in the second century B.C. When we compare these texts which have an 800-1000 years gap between them we are amazed that 95% of the texts are identical with only minor variations and a few discrepancies.

New Testament - In considering the New Testament we have tens of thousands of manuscripts of the New Testament in part or in whole, dating from the second century A.D. to the late fifteenth century, when the printing press was invented. These manuscripts have been found in Egypt, Palestine, Syria, Turkey, Greece, and Italy, making collusion unlikely. The oldest manuscript, the John Rylands manuscript, has been dated to 125 A.D. and was found in Egypt, some distance from where the New Testament was originally composed in Asia Minor). Many early Christian papyri, discovered in 1935, have been dated to 150 A.D., and include the four gospels. The Papyrus Bodmer II, discovered in 1956, has been dated to 200 A.D., and contains 14 chapters and portions of the last seven chapters of the gospel of John. The Chester Beatty biblical papyri, discovered in 1931, has been dated to 200-250 A.D. and contains the Gospels, Acts, Paul's Epistles, and Revelation. The number of manuscripts is extensive compared to other ancient historical writings, such as Caesar's "Gallic Wars" (10 Greek manuscripts, the earliest 950 years after the original), the "Annals" of Tacitus (2 manuscripts, the earliest 950 years after the original), Livy (20 manuscripts, the earliest 350 years after the original), and Plato (7 manuscripts).

Thousands of early Christian writings and lexionaries (first and second century) cite verses from the New Testament. In fact, it is nearly possible to put together the entire New Testament just from early Christian writings. For example, the Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians (dated 95 A.D.) cites verses from the Gospels, Acts, Romans, 1 Corinthians, Ephesians, Titus, Hebrews, and 1 Peter. The letters of Ignatius (dated 115 A.D.) were written to several churches in Asia Minor and cites verses from Matthew, John, Romans, 1 & 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, 1 & 2 Timothy and Titus. These letters indicate that the entire New Testament was written in the first century A.D. In addition, there is internal evidence for a first century date for the writing of the New Testament. The book of Acts ends abruptly with Paul in prison, awaiting trial (Acts 28:30-31 (1)). It is likely that Luke wrote Acts during this time, before Paul finally appeared before Nero. This would be about 62-63 A.D., meaning that Acts and Luke were written within thirty years of ministry and death of Jesus. Another internal evidence is that there is no mention of the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. Although Matthew, Mark and Luke record Jesus' prophecy that the temple and city would be destroyed within that generation (Matthew 24:1-2 (2),Mark 13:1-2 (3), Luke 21:5-9,20-24,32(4)), no New Testament book refers to this event as having happened. If they had been written after 70 A.D., it is likely that letters written after 70 A.D. would have mentioned the fulfillment of Jesus' prophecy. As stated by Nelson Glueck, former president of the Jewish Theological Seminary in the Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati, and renowned Jewish archaeologist, "In my opinion, every book of the New Testament was written between the forties and eighties of the first century A.D."

With all of the massive manuscript evidence you would think there would be massive discrepancies - just the opposite is true. New Testament manuscripts agree in 99.5% (5) of the text (compared to only 95% for the Iliad). Most of the discrepancies are in spelling and word order. A few words have been changed or added. There are two passages that are disputed but no discrepancy is of any doctrinal significance (i.e., none would alter basic Christian doctrine). Most Bibles include the options as footnotes when there are discrepancies. How could there be such accuracy over a period of 1,400 years of copying? Two reasons: The scribes that did the copying had meticulous methods for checking their copies for errors. 2) The Holy Spirit made sure we would have an accurate copy of God's word so we would not be deceived. The Mormons, theological liberals as well as other cults and false religions such as Islam that claim the Bible has been tampered with are completely proven false by the extensive, historical manuscript evidence.

Here are a couple of other links to show why the Bible can be trusted.

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/jesus/greenleaf.html

http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/divine.htm

And here is a link to the church that I attend http://www.alcf.net

2007-07-23 13:47:19 · answer #1 · answered by Martin S 7 · 1 0

Yes, it is quite reliable. It is full of wisdom, righteousness and hope in the face of mortality. Good news for some, bad news for others.

I am aware of contradictions and errors in the KJV but these are a “spiritual” distraction. There is certainly a big time spiritual message being communicated right over top of any errors in the text. There is more than enough preserved to get a man saved.

If you come to the bible on a spiritual plane and not on a natural one, you will likely see things that will blow you away. Then you will believe. Then you will be saved.

Christian, non-denominational

2007-07-23 20:42:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes; I am nondenominational, because there is only one God and when we all leave this world this is who we will go before. His word; the Bible, has sat thousands of people free from bondage's. A belief or religion is a body of people, that comes together in a building that is suppose to bring forth the gospel to that congregation, to lift up His Holy name, worship, and to fellowship with others of the same faith. By having a belief in just one denomination and confining me to just this belief I feel I am not being open minded enough to God's truth. I do not want to be labeled as someone just attending a church labeled with a belief; I would rather be labeled as a servant of Jesus Christ and one of god's children.

2007-07-23 20:58:03 · answer #3 · answered by † White-Eagle Prayer Warrior † 3 · 0 0

The King James Version. Absolutely!

2007-07-23 20:34:39 · answer #4 · answered by Q 6 · 1 0

Sure. As long as you understand the intentions of the original authors. Scripture is only "trustworthy" in the sense that a work of art is trustworthy.

2007-07-23 20:35:24 · answer #5 · answered by NONAME 7 · 0 0

Yes

2007-07-23 20:34:48 · answer #6 · answered by Casey C 3 · 1 0

Absolutely.

2007-07-23 20:44:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes!! The Bible is inspired by God. I go to Calvary Chapel!

2007-07-23 20:35:52 · answer #8 · answered by All 4 His Glory 3 · 1 0

Yes.

Pastor Art

2007-07-23 20:56:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes. if anything is false about the bible..God always reveals the truth. I'm christian (non-denominational).

2007-07-23 20:36:28 · answer #10 · answered by Ms. Lady 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers