by intolerant I mean stringent Islamic based laws on personal affairs (Islamic based marriage and divorce laws; Saudi Arabia sexist laws; laws interfering in the private life; intolerance of homosexuality and "pagan religions") As an atheist, what about separation of church from state; freedom from religion?
The "majority of people there are Muslims" argument is unsatisfactory. If minorities came into the West in the 1920s, Christian, nuclear family age - would that justify a Christian theocracy?
http://news.amnesty.org/index/ENGMDE230152004
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/people/features/ihavearightto/four_b/casestudy_art07.shtml
http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/mena/saudi/
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/engASA330181999
2007-07-22
11:38:14
·
5 answers
·
asked by
green
2
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
NQV, yes there may be some religious minorities (ie. Egypt: Muslim (mostly Sunni) 90%, Coptic 9%, other Christian 1% ) in muslim countries; however; does that justify imposing Sharia and Islamic based laws?
Are Islamic republics justified over democratic forms of governments, with laws passed on by democratically representative governments? Shouldn't laws be based on "natural rights" enscribed in the constitution as opposed to a selected religion? What about minorities?
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/eg.html#Intro
2007-07-22
11:59:20 ·
update #1
Religious minorities can get by living (instead of dying) in a religious dictatorship, but you haven't shown that the laws themselves are just or morally or constitutionally should be allowed to reign.
2007-07-22
12:02:05 ·
update #2
To hello, you've said Saudi is beautiful, but you haven't justified having an Islamic republic or the mora justification of it, nor proved why it is better than having a democratic government, nor provided any evidence.
A Nazi can just as well go "I lived in Nazi Germany and it was beautiful." (No evidence, no moral justification, no real arguments)
2007-07-22
12:39:22 ·
update #3
NQV, you've asserted that I've made "falsehoods" yet you fail to mention what lies, you've claimed that I've constructed.
2007-07-22
12:43:55 ·
update #4