pakhandi -dhambi vyabhichari
Hare Krishna , Hare Krishna , Krishna Krishna ,Hare Hare ,Hare Rama , Hare Rama , Rama Rama , Hare Hare
2007-07-22 22:06:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by KrishanRam(Jitendra k) 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chapter VII of the Bhagavad-Gita
This chapter is devoted to the question of that spiritual discernment by means of which the Supreme Spirit can be discerned in all things, and the absence of which causes a delusion constantly recurring, the producer of sorrow. Krishna says that this sort of knowledge leaves nothing else to be known, but that to attain it the heart -- that is, every part of the nature -- must be fixed on the Spirit, meditation has to be constant, and the Spirit made the refuge or abiding-place. He then goes on to show that to have attained to such a height is to be a mahatma.
Among thousands of mortals a single one perhaps strives for perfection, and among those so striving perhaps a single one knows me as I am.
This points out the difficulty to be met in any one life, but is not cause for discouragement. It simply makes clear the fact, and thus also punctures the boastful claims of those who would pretend to have reached perfection but do not show it in their acts.
He then gives an eightfold division of his inferior nature, or that part of the Universal One which can be known. This is not the nature of man, and does not oppose the theosophical sevenfold system of human principles. No particular theosophical classification for the divisions of nature has been given out. It would, on the one hand, not be understood, and on the other, disputes leading to no good end would follow. He might as well have stated the twenty-fivefold division held by some other school. This "inferior nature" is only so relatively. It is the phenomenal and transient which disappears into the superior at the end of a kalpa. It is that part of God, or of the Self, which chose to assume the phenomenal and transient position, but is, in essence, as great as the superior nature. The inferiority is only relative. As soon as objective material, and subjective spiritual, worlds appear, the first-named has to be denominated inferior to the other, because the spiritual, being the permanent base, is in that sense superior; but as an absolute whole all is equal.
Included in the inferior nature are all the visible, tangible, invisible and intangible worlds; it is what we call nature. The invisible and intangible are nonetheless actual; we know that poisonous gas, though invisible and intangible, is fatally actual and potential. Experiment and induction will confer a great deal of knowledge about the inferior nature of God and along that path the science of the modern West is treading, but before knowing the occult, hidden, intangible realms and forces --often called spiritual, but not so in fact -- the inner astral senses and powers have to be developed and used. This development is not to be forced, as one would construct a machine for performing some operation, but will come in its own time as all our senses and powers have come. It is true that a good many are trying to force the process, but at last they will discover that human evolution is universal and not particular; one man cannot go very far beyond his race before the time.
2007-07-22 11:09:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by scorpion 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I KNOW!!! Let's have a category for 'religion and spirituality,'' and another separate one called, oh, 'Christian Bashing'
Then the two categories could perhaps refrain from 'hatefulness' or maybe we could add that also, as an extra category, since this seems to be a strange place to see so much of the latter two, and so truly little of the first.
ugh! this place has just become too creepy, with everyone defending their own little 'turf' to the death, while spitting on everything else.
2007-07-22 18:56:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dick Knows 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Demons.
A person that rejects God and does everything they can just to satisfy the senses is said in the Bhagvat Gita to have a "demonic nature".
2007-07-23 16:13:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by dave_martin_7777 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hmm.. I don't know the words Krsna used off the top of my head, but I can think of some myself like sinful pretenders, hypocrites in illusion,
I guess I should do a bit of research :-)
thank you for urging me to think of Krsna's words
2007-07-22 18:16:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by happy_n_freeone 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kevin
2007-07-22 09:40:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by gasp 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
ram did to go to a out caste poor lady and have berries from her hands instead of so called religious person because of her purity at heart and good intent,was she servant of her senses? if she was she was preferred by LORD RAM
2007-07-22 12:04:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Brahma-Bandhu One who claims to be a Brahman but doesn't have the qualifications.
2007-07-22 22:47:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
piefkeholz, Your Jesus was trained in Himalayas, and than initiated.
We know things better than you, at least in these aspects. Please follow what you like, and just learn to answer the question.
don't simply poke your nose with unwanted and irritating information, better to just leave.. when no one invited isn't it.
I have respect to Jesus, but really you dumb people get irritating at times, and i think, lately, all the time.
-- deito
2007-07-22 11:14:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by deito 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
à¤
शासà¥à¤¤à¥à¤°à¤µà¤¿à¤¹à¤¿à¤¤à¤ à¤à¥à¤°à¤ तपà¥à¤¯à¤¨à¥à¤¤à¥ यॠतपॠà¤à¤¨à¤¾à¤ ।
दमà¥à¤à¤¾à¤¹à¤à¤à¤¾à¤°à¤¸à¤à¤¯à¥à¤à¥à¤¤à¤¾à¤ à¤à¤¾à¤®à¤°à¤¾à¤à¤¬à¤²à¤¾à¤¨à¥à¤µà¤¿à¤¤à¤¾à¤ ॥१à¥- ५॥
à¤à¤°à¥à¤·à¤¯à¤¨à¥à¤¤à¤ शरà¥à¤°à¤¸à¥à¤¥à¤ à¤à¥à¤¤à¤à¥à¤°à¤¾à¤®à¤®à¤à¥à¤¤à¤¸à¤ ।
माठà¤à¥à¤µà¤¾à¤¨à¥à¤¤à¤à¤¶à¤°à¥à¤°à¤¸à¥à¤¥à¤ तानà¥à¤µà¤¿à¤¦à¥à¤§à¥à¤¯à¤¾à¤¸à¥à¤°à¤¨à¤¿à¤¶à¥à¤à¤¯à¤¾à¤¨à¥ ॥१à¥- ६॥
They are called as "ASURI BHAVA" people
2007-07-24 10:09:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Shripathi Krishna Acharya 5
·
1⤊
0⤋