The military is trying to be police officers in a religious war, they are held by certain rules of war. Mercenaries are not held by the same rules. stop going after the foot soldiers and lets go after the heads of the Taliban and A Q.
2007-07-22 01:38:06 · 7 answers · asked by bulletbob36 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
As far as cost, Mercs would be cheaper. Giving them a blank check for destruction would have some bad results. Personally i think a mix of mercenary and military would be the best thing. We are always looking for the 'heads' of the taliban, the foot soldiers just get in the way sometimes.
2007-07-22 01:57:54 · answer #1 · answered by Hjaduk 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
First for prankster. All most all for the merc.s that are there are prior military whether it British SAS or US forces.
As far as the Question goes I agree. Get the ones in charge. I also can't stand the fact that our military is trying to fight a war with their hands tied. They can't do what needs to be done. The way I see it if your not helping us your helping them. We can't shoot some one who is running through a crowd for fear of hitting a by-stander. They didn't stop him when he was shooting and didn't try to stop him from getting away. The way I see it they just helped him get away. We need to send in a sweeper team and take all leaders or suspected leaders down.
2007-07-22 03:01:56 · answer #2 · answered by shark81s 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have big problem with our reliance on mercenaries in this troubled occupation. The trend to use Blackwater instead of trained professionals is worrisome.
2007-07-22 02:51:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
A Hermit. it would be exciting to scare of youngsters :D And searching for nutrition must be exciting. additionally buliding shield, its like arising your man or woman little dwelling house. Kinda like the starvation video games. !! :D
2016-10-09 05:51:23 · answer #4 · answered by holtzer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, actually the USA is trying to stop further bloodshed rather than leave them to the dogs. funny how people cry about darfur slaughter yet want Iraq to fall to a civil war.
2007-07-22 02:41:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Good point.
But actually attacking the enemy is too logical for politicians.
2007-07-22 01:41:10 · answer #6 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
OK !
2007-07-22 01:41:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋