You can't even compare the two- Jesus and Mohammed.
Jesus was a pacifist, taught forgiveness and the golden rule. Jesus loved the little children.
Mohammed was a bloodthirsty warmonger, taught beheading and terrorism. Mohammed had s.e.x with a little child named Aisha (he married a 6 year old and r.ayped her when she was 9).
Regardless of what religion you are, or if you believe in religion at all-- the historical record indicates Jesus was a good hearted saintly man.
The historical record PROVES that Mohammed was evil and could not have died a horrible enough death to atone for his sins
2007-07-21 06:19:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Deep Sky Fan Club 2
·
4⤊
4⤋
It is true that life repeats itself and that people should learn from the mistakes others have made so that they won't also repeat them.
There is a big difference here though. Moses had signs following him to prove he was sent from God that were witnessed by the Jewish people as well as the Egyptians(his rod turning into a snake, his hand turning leprous when placed inside his cloak, turning the Nile into blood, bringing in different plagues of locusts, frogs, gnats, etc. and the death of any firstborn not under the blood of the Passover lamb).
Jesus also had signs to prove he was sent from God (3 years of healing multitudes of the sick, the crippled, the deaf, the blind, the demon-possessed; raising the dead, feeding thousands from a couple of loaves of bread, etc.) but Mohammad did not have this necessary form of proof to be able to convince the people with.
Jesus came not to abolish the Mosaic law but to fulfill it. Jesus brought in the New Covenant that was prophesied.
The Quran is different in that although it does contain many truths from the Bible, it also contradicts some of its other truths. It denies the truths about Jesus, and his teachings.
There have been others who have had claimed to be the last prophet or even saying they are the Christ. The only way to know is for each person to carefully examine the Scriptures and seek the LORD for a correct understanding.
2007-07-21 06:53:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by nicky 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Historically the Jews have been badly treated in Europe at times:
eg
1) late Roman empire
2) late medieval ages
3) 20th century Austria and Germany
4) Russia and Poland
Some people who encouraged this have a few times used words about the Jews rejecting the messiah, more often though its more been about Jews being people who are taking all the money etc - convenient scapegoats for bad politicians.
A lot of these attitudes have now migrated to the Middle East.
Most Jews, but not all (all the initial believers were Jews from Israel or from the diaspora coming to Jewsish festivals) ended up following rabbinical teaching and deciding he was not messiah. He wasn't the gratifying man of powerful military action that many jews of that time wanted. He also told the self-righteous religious rulers (like many imams + mullahs in believeing they are wise, educated and good) that they were sinners in need of forgiveness - mosyt didnt like that, although its just what prophets said in the Old Testament.
However mohammed matches desctriptions of false prophet and antichrist consummately (best antichrist yet, i.e. denying Jesus is Son of God and Saviour). If he denies core message of salvation not surprisingly he is not accepted.
2007-07-21 07:00:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cader and Glyder scrambler 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't blame Jews for not accepting Jesus. I wouldn't believe in a so-called "revealed religion" unless it is personally revealed to ME (and can be independently verified), so I don't blame anybody for not accepting anything without substantive proof. Religion is a toxic "meme" - a mind virus that corrupts rational thought. Humans need a god to worship like a fish needs a bicycle. We'd all be much better off without religions and the wars and other hardships they have caused . . . and continue to cause.
2007-07-21 06:26:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by 222 Sexy 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
at the start, we don't blame the Jewish human beings for no longer accepting Jesus. maximum of his formerly followers have been Jewish and early fathers of our faith. Jesus exchange into the Son of God and Moses and Muhammed weren't. based on your concept of existence repeating himself, we ought to continuously assume anothe prophet precise?
2016-09-30 10:27:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nobody blames the Jews for not accepting Jesus, but Muslims have the cheek to blame the Jews for "rejecting" Jewish prophets today! Also for not accepting their Arabian pagan reinvented prophet. Now you can't blame Christians for not accepting a false prophet like that, David Koresh, Warren jeffs, etc who like to have fun with underage girls and women while pretending they are holy examples.
Question is why all the Muslims didn't follow Warren Jeffs or Bahaullah and become Bahais and so on ad infinitum. Bahaullah claimed to supersede mohammad. According to this insane logic, where will it end ?
2007-07-21 06:16:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by defOf 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
Only the truly ignorant ones that blame the Jewish people for Jesus' crucification.
2007-07-21 06:21:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
This one example of injustice..
I seriously can't believe that those who call themselves followers of Jesus Christ humiliate others!
Why in the world did I see and answer saying Muhammad is a warmonger, adulterer etc..
I believe that there is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is His Messenger..
If you've got a problem with that, fine!
Don't make fun of people's belief...
May Allah guide us all..
2007-07-21 11:31:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by @hm@d {War Against Noub!} 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because God set his covenant with the Jews through Isaac. The Jews have consistently turned their back on God but ultimately repented. Because of this I am not under any inclination to renounce them. As for the Muslims, it is none of my business what my neighbor does. But the Jews are a special people because they have been the weakest and most susceptible to danger, but also the most perseverent.
2007-07-21 06:22:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Muhammad was a man with a book of his own he should have been rejected. He had no knowledge...he was a fake.
Sure there is nothing new under the sun. Yet man is still captivated by sin.
The Jews are no different than any other man when it comes to Jesus...if you read your Bible then you would not be typing this stuff.
2007-07-21 06:22:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by God is love. 6
·
4⤊
5⤋