English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So therse no confusion im Debating and im the negative side.

2007-07-20 22:41:36 · 3 answers · asked by patav2 2 in Environment Other - Environment

3 answers

I believe so. What you are talking about could be considered arson and it also could result in lose off life and property, as well as the cost to the community to extinguish the fire.

2007-07-21 00:03:24 · answer #1 · answered by xg6 7 · 1 0

I think that they should get some kind of prison sentence for destroying hundreds of homes. All the destruction and frustration with fighting a fire like that also needs to be taken account for.
Hey, didn't that runaway bride a while back whom said she was kidnapped get community service and have to pay a fine for all the trouble she caused? Why shouldn't people who start massive brush fires and destroy other peoples lives, or even kill other people get off with nothing?
Why don't you go think about that before thinking about whether someone should be put in jail madatorily...

2007-07-21 09:31:30 · answer #2 · answered by Weather nut 2 · 0 0

I am anti-mandatory sentences.

2007-07-21 05:44:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers