longer runway for landing? (I mean is it spelled out in the Pilot's Operating Handbook) What about Airbus's limitations for landing on wet runways? Anyone know the answers to these?
2007-07-20
16:29:39
·
3 answers
·
asked by
plezurgui
6
in
Cars & Transportation
➔ Aircraft
efarrell01: Sure, 4800 feet wouldn't do you much good if you touched down at 2400 would it?
If 4800 dry is required and if you had to add say 10% for wet and some other number for T/R inop, and then compound the problem with poor drainage and big downpour, I can easily see 6300 feet disappearing REAL soon.
2007-07-20
16:57:47 ·
update #1