English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Info: The 'John Doe' Provision was cut from yesterday's (19 July) Home Land Security Bill?

Background: The 'John Doe' Provision was designed to protect the public from being sued for reporting suspicious behavior that may lead to a terrorist attack.

source: http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070719/NATION/70719001/1001

Question.

1. What are your thoughts on this?
2. Did you even know about it?

2007-07-20 10:27:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Civic Participation

5 answers

No I didn't know about it nor do I really care about Law. If I see something terroristic I must judge for myself what act I shall play but thanks for nothing.

2007-07-20 12:10:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1.) Dropping it sounds like the right thing to do. If a person is harmed by another's accusation of "suspicious behavior", of course the injured party should be permitted to sue.

2.) No, i didn't already know about this, but that's the state of the media in the US.

2007-07-21 07:54:46 · answer #2 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 0 0

Good to inform.

1.Answered.

2.Answered.

Regards

2007-07-21 13:06:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No I didn't know about this. Seems absolutely incredible.

2007-07-20 17:58:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I authored that provision.and even i did not know that!!!!!

2007-07-20 21:12:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers