Who has a a better plan to win the war in Iraq, Me or Bush?

Question

see my 360 blog please

When Clinton was president we had our longest running economic boom, a budget surplus and America was the worlds only superpower. Then in 2001 W. is inaugarated. In a few months the economy is as bad as it was when the other George Bush was president and America got knocked on it's *** by a few terrorists, who didn't even have guns. W may have good military advisors, a diploma from Yale+ a pilot's licence, but he's still a retard. We wont get out of this mess until some Arab assasinates him.

Answer 1

You. Your plan probably would work, but President Bush is in charge and he hasn't got the balls to do what is necessary. If he did he wouldn't have been in the Air National Guard. He would have served his country by cruising Thrurogh Vietnam on a swift boat and hunting VIC with a 50 caliber.

Answer 2

Those terrorist started planning 9/11 way before Bush got into office. He had only been in the White House for six months when 9/11 happened. That was a well though out plan that took years to come up with! The terrorist who were on those planes that day were in the US taking flying lessons months before Bush was even elected President. And what about the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993? Or the attack on the USS Cole in 2000? Both attacks were carried out by the same group that attacked us on 9/11. Clinton should have done something then! I guess it took more then three thousand people being murdered within a matter of a few minutes before someone finally done something about it! When the fatalities were only 6 at the bombing in 1993, or the fact that the Cole attack was done to a bunch of Military people, nobody seemed too worried about it. People need to realize the this was a long time coming!

Answer 3

unquestionably it form of feels that the two Obama and Clinton agree that invading Iran is a stable thought. Clinton unquestionably scolded Bush for not having bombed them already. greater troops in Iraq = lower back UP! Oh, and by ways... the struggle replace right into a fulfillment. Now that's technically police action reason the job replace into to disarm Saddam... properly i could say Saddam is disarmed, would not you? Now the Iraqis can vote and that they are shifting greater in direction of democracy. that's basically that there are people who do not agree, so as that they bomb civilians... Why? using fact those civilians have the staggering to vote, and concern will reason particular votes to be solid... As we considered with Saddam in the previous... hence him getting ninety 9% of the votes. everyone who gets that top of votes is obviously doing something that he's not meant to be. wager what although... I wager he had 0 this previous election. human beings do basically not look on the obtrusive.

Answer 4

Sorry but I don't need to see you blog to know that the President's plan is best. After you graduate from one of the military academies and consult with senior three and four star General Officers and Flag Officers as well as a host of top civilian military advisors - then I might consider looking at your blog.

Answer 5

I'll gladly read your blog when you can show me the sources and content of intelligence information that you posses that is comparable to what the president receives on a daily basis. Without that information, I seriously doubt that any plan you might come up with would be credible to me.

Answer 6

Great plan with typical German efficiency. I'm sure the Israelis will be knocking on your door for your plan re: the Palestinian question. Tag.

Answer 7

this is not a Question you are promoting your crape.. net time just say go to my blog or call all 2 of your Friends and thay can read you rant/ blog..

Answer 8

I say with all the nuclear war arms we have we can just completely blow-up the entire area of IRAQ>

Answer 9

Go Navy:)
Lousy plan though,but at least you gave it some thought.

Answer 10

I didn't read your blog, but my answer is the same. You.