English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After all, Windows is very similar to our world......it was designed by a bunch of idiot designers, it often breaks, is energy-inefficient, requires prayer to make it work, has a ton of code that doesn't make any sense, has a great deal of conflicting components, and the system will eventually die.

2007-07-20 04:14:28 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Linux macroevolved by a countless number of tiny micro-mutations; which is why it works so much better than Windows.

2007-07-20 04:17:33 · update #1

12 answers

Wait, what about linux? I can show the evolution of UNIX leading to linux, so how does that fit in?

2007-07-20 04:16:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

ROTFL- Well, that's actually a great point for any creationist to get into!!

I still hold my opinion that the only unsurmountable barrier to creationism is the theological one. I mean, your point is actually great! Anytime any evolutionist point things like the presence of appendix or our vertebrae column to prove that evolution exist, a creationist could reply by saying that, in the same way that our vertebrae Microsoft Windows sucks and it was designed. The only problem with that is theological. Its implying that God is not perfect. And that is unacceptable

Paz de Cristo

Still ROTFL by the way

=============================================
Oh and do you see! you have the windows 3.1 the 3.11 the Windows 95, the Windows 98, the Windows XP and the Windows Vista, it all clearly seem to have evolved, but it was acctually designed!!!

2007-07-20 04:17:50 · answer #2 · answered by Emiliano M. 6 · 1 0

Is intelligent designed only to make a lot of money by monopolistic practices.

2007-07-20 04:17:55 · answer #3 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 1 0

That is SCARY, because it would mean the Microsoft was created in Bill Gates image.
Poor Bill! :(
LOL

2007-07-20 04:23:30 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

No.
It only serves to illustrate that the "watchmaker theory" is utterly flawed and that anyone who uses such an argument is poorly-educated at best.

2007-07-20 04:17:50 · answer #5 · answered by Yoda Green 5 · 0 1

Sssh don't tell Bill Gates, he's an Atheist and he'd be very upset to hear this.

2007-07-20 04:19:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If windows evolved from DOS, why is there still DOS?

2007-07-20 04:20:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

LOL. I do not see it that way. I see plenty of proof around me about the existence of God.

2007-07-20 04:17:29 · answer #8 · answered by Ulrika 5 · 1 0

you forgot to say it's extremely vulnerable to viruses

2007-07-20 04:18:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

By creationists' standards, yeah, it probably does. ;P

2007-07-20 04:16:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers