What is the RCC doctrine on decrees and edicts of Popes declared by following Popes to have been "false?"

Question

The RCC claims an unbroken connection to the Apostle Peter. When a Pope, who is considered the voice of Christ on earth, is proclaimed by a later Pope to have been "a False Pope" how are the proclaimations made by the false Pope dealt with by the Vatican? The current Pope has spoken in the past about false Popes and who is to say the next Pope will not claim that Pope Benedict was a false Pope? How do you logically reconcile this with the claim of "unbroken succession?"

Meg, respectfully, you prove my point of the fallibility of Popes. Pope Paul and Benedict changed edicts and decrees. How can this be done if the word of the Pope is infallible? Has anybody looked up the word infallible?
http://www.truecatholic.org
Take a minute and research:
Catechism on the errors of Vatican II
House of Borgia ["infallibles" for which there is a Tower of Borgia at the Vatican to honor such as these.

You either want the whole of history, or you want a small piece. Also,
"Hitler's Pope", type it in and see the pictures. Pope Benedict has said in that magic, infallible tongue that the Vatican II was full off errors and liberalism. If Pope John Paul was the voice of Christ, why did Benedict go directly against John Paul's personal orders to have certain personal journals desroyed after his death, only to have those instructions ignored by Benedict, his trusted friend? Jesus doesn't change His mind, His Word is true. History is showing a few chinks in the RCC cloak of infallibility. Of course, you may not be interested in history. Jesus has only one solution for sin after becoming His by faith. Admit it and quit it. You can not change what they did any more than I can change my church history, but I don't have to live in darkness by refusing to read it. Protestants are reading more about RCC than the members. The Jews are God's Chosen, and they do well to distrust the RCC.

Answer 1

How convenient of the RCC to rewrite history and declare whatever they wish to be true.

They worship icons, venerate men, and call a mere women the "Mother of GOD".

It is no wonder that the Protestants revolted against such error.

dave

Answer 2

>>who is to say the next Pope will not claim that Pope Benedict was a false Pope?<<

It doesn't work that way. An antipope is "a false claimant of the Holy See in opposition to a pontiff canonically elected." Who else is claiming to be Pope? Is there any confusion in the mind of the public who is Pope? Have any Cardinals said, "no, no, so-and-so is the REAL Pope"?

Decrees and edicts can be overturned even if the previous Pope was legitimate. For example, John Paul II changed the rules for conclaves, and Benedict XVI changed them yet again.

Answer 3

Hmmm.... I am unaware of any pope proclaimed to be a "false" pope by a later pope. When did Benny 16 mention false popes?

Jim

Answer 4

Can there be false Popes?Popes are elected by their fellow cardinals and then become gods representative on earth and enjoy Papal infallibility.in whatever they say or do.